Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, C: Software & Data Engineering, Volume 22 Issue 2

17. J. Dean and S. Ghemawat, “Mapreduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 107–113, 2008. 18. ——, “Mapreduce: A flexible data processing tool, ”Communications of the ACM, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 72–77, 2010. 19. M. Saouabi and A. Ezzati, “A comparative between hadoop mapreduce and apache spark on hdfs,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Internet of Things and Machine Learning, 2017, pp. 1–4. 20. S. Gopalani and R. Arora, “Comparing apache spark and map reduce with performance analysis using kmeans,” International journal of computer applications, vol. 113, no. 1, 2015. 21. K. Aziz, D. Zaidouni, and M. Bellafkih, “Real-time data analysis using spark and hadoop,” in 2018 4th international conference on optimization and applications (ICOA), IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–6. 22. G. Van Rossum et al., “Python programming language.,” in USENIX annual technical conference, vol. 41, 2007, p. 36. 23. M. Odersky et al., “An overview of the scala programming language,” 2004. 24. K. Arnold, J. Gosling, and D. Holmes, The Java programming language. Addison Wesley Professional, 2005. 25. A. Spark, “Apache spark,” Retrieved January, vol. 17, p. 2018, 2018. 26. P. Moritz et al., “Ray: A distributed framework for emerging ai applications,” in Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 2018, pp. 561– 577. 27. M. Rocklin, “Dask: Parallel computation with blocked algorithms and task scheduling,” in Proceedings of the 14th python in science conference, Citeseer, vol. 126, 2015. 28. M. Dugr´e, V. Hayot-Sasson, and T. Glatard, “A performance comparison of dask and apache spark for dataintensive neuroimaging pipelines,” in 2019 IEEE/ACM Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science (WORKS), IEEE, 2019, pp. 40–49. 29. P. Mehta et al., “Comparative evaluation of big-data systems on scientific image analytics workloads,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.02485, 2016. 30. D. O. W. .-. D. S. analytics in Python. “Dask document-tation - comparison to spark.” (Mar. 2021), [Online]. Available: https://docs.dask.org /en/latest/spark.html. 31. R. Nishihara et al., “Real-time machine learning: The missing pieces,” in Proceedings of the 16th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems, 2017, pp. 106–110. 32. H. Li, G. Fox, and J. Qiu, “Performance model for parallel matrix multiplication with dryad: Dataflow graph runtime,” in 2012 Second International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing, IEEE, 2012, pp. 675–683. 33. S. Bykov, A. Geller, G. Kliot, J. R. Larus, R. Pandya, and J. Thelin, “Orleans: Cloud computing for everyone,” in Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, 2011, pp. 1–14. 34. P. Bernstein, S. Bykov, A. Geller, G. Kliot, and J. Thelin, “Orleans: Distributed virtual actors for programmability and scalability,” MSR-TR-2014–41, 2014. 35. T. O. Webpage. “Tensorflow.” (Dec. 2021), [Online]. Available: https://www.tensorflow.org/. 36. F. A. Aslam, H. N. Mohammed, and P. Lokhande, “Efficient way of web development using python and flask,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 54–57, 2015. 37. C. Olston et al., “Tensorflow-serving: Flexible, high- performance ml serving,” arXiv preprint arXiv: 1712.06139, 2017. 38. G. Litjens et al., “A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis,” Medical image analysis, vol. 42, pp. 60–88, 2017. 39. S. Han, “Efficient methods and hardware for deep learning,” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, 2017. 40. M. Zaharia et al., “Resilient distributed datasets: A fault-tolerant abstraction for in-memory cluster computing,” in 9th Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation 12), 2012, pp. 15–28. 41. C. Cheng, C. W. Lee, and C. Daskalakis, “A reproducible computerized method for quantitation of capillary density using nailfold capillaroscopy,” Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE, no. 104, 2015. 42. A. Tama, T. R. Mengko, and H. Zakaria, “Nailfold capillaroscopy image processing for morphological parameters measurement,” in 2015 4th International Conference on Instrumentation, Communications, Information Technology, and Biomedical Engineering (ICICI-BME), IEEE, 2015, pp. 175–179. 43. [43] S. G. Clendenon et al., “A simple automated method for continuous fieldwise measurement of microvascular hemodynamics,” Microvascular research, vol. 123, pp. 7–13, 2019. 44. P. Prentaˇsi´c et al., “Segmentation of the foveal microvasculature using deep learning networks,” Journal of biomedical optics, vol. 21, no. 7, p. 075 008, 2016. 45. R. Nivedha, M. Brinda, K. Suma, and B. Rao, “Classification of nailfold capillary images in patients with hypertension using non-linear svm,” in 2016 International Conference on Circuits, Controls, Communications and Computing (I4C), IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–5. Capillary X: A Software Design Pattern for Analyzing Medical Images in Real-time using Deep Learning Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology Volume XXII Issue II Version I 22 Year 2022 ( ) C © 2022 Global Journals