Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, D: Neural & Artificial Intelligence, Volume 23 Issue 2

Figure 8: Train, Test and Predictions Results of the MostPrecise Forecasting Model The accuracy results for each prediction mode that was developed employing both window size and the volume of input data delivered into the model to be trained as variable parameters are shown in Table III, IV, and Table V below. Table III: Accuracy Table of the Models Trained usingWindow Size_12 Volume of input (DataPoints) Window size(Data Points) Accuracy % 2016 12 72.87 4032 12 72.91 6048 12 73.42 8064 12 74.59 Table IV: Accuracy Table of the Models Trained usingVariable Window Sizes Volume of input (Data Points) Window size (Data Points) Accuracy % 8064 6 74.49 8064 12 74.59 8064 24 75.34 8064 60 73.58 8064 288 72.07 Table V: Accuracy Table of the Models Trained usingWindow Size_24 © 2023 Global Journals Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology Volume XXIII Issue II Version I 48 ( ) Year 2023 D Traffic Flow Forecast based on Vehicle Count Volume of input (Data Points) Window size (Data Points) Accuracy % 2016 24 74.20 4032 24 73.78 6048 24 73.96 8064 24 75.34