Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, G: Interdisciplinary, Volume 23 Issue 1

Figure 10: Scatter Plot for Project Management and Remote ERP Implementation Success To further ascertain on positive relationship visible through scatter diagrams, the study accommodated an inferential statistic tool. Accordingly, the Pearson correlational test was performed using the sample size n = 269 to affirm on positive relationship and further enrich the analysis by indicating the magnitude/strength of the identified relationship between identified factors and remote ERP implementation success. Pearson correlation coefficients can be positive or negative (direction), and their magnitude might be high or low. Correlation coefficients range from -1 to +1, indicating perfect negative to positive correlation coefficients, and 0 indicating no correlation (zero relationships) (Sedgwick, 2012). Further, correlation coefficients less than 0.30 (negative or positive), between 0.30 – 0.6, and above 0.6 indicate a weak, moderate, and strong relationship between control and response variable (Akoglu, 2018). Table 5: Pearson Correlation Test Results Remote ERP Implementation Success Remote ERP Implementation Success Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) N 1.000 269 Top Management Commitment Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) N 0.087 .157 269 Change Management Correlation Coefficient 0.107 Sig. (2-tailed) .080 N 269 Communication Correlation Coefficient 0.542** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 N 269 Implementation Strategy Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) N 0.249** .000 269 User Training and Education Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) 0.878** .000 N 269 Project Management Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) 0.031 .607 N 269 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Source: Authors’ Representation Based on SPSS Results © 2023 Global Journals Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology Volume XXIII Issue I Version I 38 ( ) Year 2023 G Critical Success Factors of Remote ERP Implementation: From System Users’ Perspective