Global Journal of Human Social Science, C: Sociology and Culture, Volume 23 Issue 2

discrimination against girly, and/or transgender, and/or older people. The second point, the strategy of some of the participants who stayed near the City Guard and/or the police to avoid possible acts of violence were not a guarantee of non-violence. Somewhat, these conclusions get closer by Dutra and Miranda’s found outputs (2013) when the said that the police had beaten the participants of Juiz de Fora’s Parade. Ribeiro and Arantes (2017) made a research about the “LGBT Parade” in São Paulo (SP). The authors analyzed the media speeches about this event and highlighted the generic use referring to participants as people and/or activists. The criticism is properly the erasure of gender and sexuality’s markers to identify politically the LGBTQIA+ community. Even the violence was not the main focus, the researchers related a case of a resident who threw a bomb at the people who were making noise near the place he lives. Differently from Dutra and Miranda (2013), Ribeiro and Arantes (2017) understood that the violence’s scene integrates a part of the Parade, even when it happens not too close to the event. Mota (2016) still researched the “LGBT Pride’s Parade” in São Paulo and, even without quantitative data, affirms that in the Paulista avenue all LGBTQIA+ people had suffered some kind of violence. The main ideal to this author is that the Parade, even when exhibits binarisms and stereotypes committed by the own LGBTQIA+ participants, turns up on fight territory against heteronormativity, just like defended in Moreira and Maia’s work (2017). Beyond these factors, we can consider that the political act’s context of a Parada, by itself, already would put sexuality in the spotlight. Violence linked to the sexuality is important to the design of a speech that puts LGBTQIA+ as violence’s victims. This way, there, into the militancy’s spot, it would be politically expected that discrimination and aggression against such sexuality’s expression were understood as important, for this is a strategy to guarantee rights and criminalization of these kinds of violence and even the recognition of these people as subjects 5 . However, it’s needed to say that, working with a survey, there was no opportunities to the survey respondents qualify the kinds of violence committed according to the context and the form. In addition, the data was produced from the “said”, once, for the limited time, we did not focus on the “lived”, although saying is a way of living. Table 1: Questionnaire Items Axe Item Item’s Description DISCRIMINATION DISCR_TRAB due to your sexuality, have you ever faced not being admitted for or being fired from a job? DISCR_COM due to your sexuality, have you ever faced receiving a different treatment or stopped from entering a business /place of entertainment? DISCR_SAUDE due to your sexuality, have you ever faced getting terrible service in health facilities or from health professionals? DISCR_EDUC due to your sexuality, have you ever faced being marginalized by teachers or classmates at school/college? DISCR_COMUN due to your sexuality, have you ever faced being excluded or marginalized from groups of friends or neighbors? DISCR_FAM due to your sexuality, have you ever faced being excluded or marginalized in the family environment? DISCR_RELIG due to your sexuality, have you ever faced being excluded or marginalized in a religious environment? DISCR_SANGUE due to your sexuality, have you ever faced being stopped from donating blood? DISCR_DELEG due to your sexuality, have you ever faced being abused by police officers or being mistreated in a police station? AGGRESSION AGRES_FIS due to your sexuality, have you ever suffered physical aggression? AGRES_VERB due to your sexuality, have you ever suffered verbal aggression/threat of aggression? AGRES_CIND due to your sexuality, have you ever suffered “ boa noite cinderela ”(roofie)? AGRES_SEX due to your sexuality, have you ever suffered sexual violence? AGRESS_EXT due to your sexuality, have you ever suffered blackmail or extorsion? 5 Laura Lowenkron (2015), from researches about child sexual abuse and people traffic for sexual exploration, and Sérgio Carrara (2015), from a reflection on sexual politics and the changes in sexuality devices, demonstrate how speeches that designs the victims operate tactical and strategically in certain contexts. © 2023 Global Journals Volume XXIII Issue II Version I 50 ( ) Global Journal of Human Social Science - Year 2023 C Sexuality and Violence: Analysis of a LGBT Citizenship Parade in Campo Grande-MS