Global Journal of Human Social Science, C: Sociology and Culture, Volume 23 Issue 2

Figure 3: Graphic of the distribution of violence scores by category Sexual orientation is the prevailing factor to pre- dispose or not the individual to suffer violence, that is, regardless of being or not in a relationship, of living alone or with someone, of being young or not, of being white or not, of being religious or not, of their education, of having a paid job or not, a subject from the LGBTQIA+ population in the context investigated will suffer more violence than their heterosexual counterpart. As Colling and Leopoldo (2016) put it, [...] the homosexual desire (not necessarily a homosexual´s desire) may un-structure a phallocratic society. And this is one of the reasons of the anti-homosexual paranoia, of the anti-homosexual panic which, quite often, transmutes into aggression, into macho terrorism – the dark atmosphere of fear – and, in a most obscene way, into murder, into the physical elimination of the other (2016, p. 14). Table 3 shows the reliability intervals (RI) of the violence scores which affirm this statement. In all cases, LGBTQIA+ people have violence scores statistically higher than heterosexual people, as proved by the One- Way Anova test, with p-value equal to zero in all tests, regardless of the social marker. Table 3: Reliability Intervals by Social Marker of Difference Social Markers of Difference Assumptions (95% of reliability) Factor RI Generation H 0 : Age influences the difference of the violence score between the LGBTQIA+ population and the heterosexual one. H 1 : Age does not influence the difference of the violence score between the LGBTQIA+ population and the heterosexual one . Heterosexual 30 years old or over (-0.337; 1.361) Heterosexual 30 years old or over (-0.837; 1.726) LGBTQIA+ 30 years old or less (3.759; 4.543) LGBTQIA+ 30 years old or less (2.947; 4.624) Race/Color (IBGE) H 0 : Race/color influences the difference of the violence score between the LGBTQIA+ population and the heterosexual one. H 1 : Race/color does not influence the difference of the violence score between the LGBTQIA+ population and the heterosexual one . White heterosexual (-0.613; 1.656) White heterossexual (-0.435; 1.379) White LGBTQIA+ (3.612; 4.674) Non-white LGBTQIA+ (3.560; 4.518) © 2023 Global Journals Volume XXIII Issue II Version I 53 ( ) Global Journal of Human Social Science - Year 2023 C Sexuality and Violence: Analysis of a LGBT Citizenship Parade in Campo Grande-MS