Global Journal of Human Social Science, C: Sociology and Culture, Volume 23 Issue 2

Religion H 0 : Religion influences the difference of the violence score between the LGBTQIA+ population and the heterosexual one. H 1 : Religion does not influence the difference of the violence score between the LGBTQIA+ population and the heterosexual one . Religious heterosexual (-0.525; 1.743) Non-religious heterosexual (-0.490; 1.323) Religious LGBTQIA+ (3.622; 4.802) Non-religious LGBTQIA+ (3.568; 4.459) Education H 0 : Education influences the difference of the violence score between the LGBTQIA+ population and the heterosexual one. H 1 : Education does not influence the difference of the violence score between the LGBTQIA+ population and the heterosexual one . Heterosexual who went to high- school or less (-0.380; 1.796) Heterosexual who went to college (-0.558; 1.244) LGBTQIA+ who went to high- school or less (2.964; 3.958) LGBTQIA+ who went to college (4.201; 5.178) Income H 0 : Salary influences the difference of the violence score between the LGBTQIA+ population and the heterosexual one. H 1 : Salary does not influence the difference of the violence score between the LGBTQIA+ population and the heterosexual one . Heterosexual without a paid job (-0.646; 1.526) Heterossexual with a paid job (-0.402; 1.461) LGBTQIA+ without a paid job (3.770; 4.896) LGBTQIA+ with a paid job (3.465; 4.379) Thus, even if hypothetically participants in the “18th LGBT Citizen Parade” of Campo Grande/MS can pass through violence’s situation in relation to generation (older people), race/color (black people and/or natives), religion (non-Christian people), education (people with no higher-education), social class (poor people) and territoriality (people who live in the periphery), our data points that sexuality can be, depending on the context, factor of a bigger condition of LGBTQIA+’s vulnerability. Such data is extremely crucial concerning the political and social role of continuing with the LGBT Parades both in Campo Grande/MS and in other parts of Brazil and world. After all, such events have the purpose of raising awareness the whole society the importance of enforcing the human rights of LGBTQIA+ people, in terms of leading a visible life. From a general point of view, even if visually one may infer from Figure 3 that the LGBTQIA+ population reports the violence more frequently suffered, we have utilized inferential statistics to validate such statement. Parametric one-way Anova test was used to evince if there is significant statistical difference in violence when the heterosexual and the LGBTQIA+ populations are compared based on the respondent sample. Although the values do not follow a normal distribution, the One-Way Anova test is statistically more powerful that a non-parametric test, considering that data come from two groups with 15 values each one. The test was based on the following assumptions: H 0 : Violence scores are the same for the LGBTQIA+ population and heterosexual people. H 1 : Violence scores are different for the LGBTQIA+ population and the heterosexual people . One-Way Anova test, with 95% of reliability, applied generally in relation to sexuality, yields to a RI for the heterosexuals equal to (-0.214; 1.197) and for the LGBTQIA+ population to (3.731; 4.440), with p- value=0,000, that is, the null assumption is rejected, once the violence’s score perceived by the LGBTQIA+ population is higher than for heterosexuals. This difference can be easily watched in the graphical representation shown in Figure 4. © 2023 Global Journals Volume XXIII Issue II Version I 54 ( ) Global Journal of Human Social Science - Year 2023 C Sexuality and Violence: Analysis of a LGBT Citizenship Parade in Campo Grande-MS