Global Journal of Human Social Science, C: Sociology and Culture, Volume 23 Issue 3

reactions to various kinds of external and internal influences; 4) physical actions and activities; 5) desires; 6) thinking, intellectual activity; 7) emotions; 8) speech. At the same time, the emotional system seems to be one of the most complex and least autonomous systems of a person. On the one hand, it activates all other systems of Homo Sapiens, and on the other hand, "almost all other human systems take part in the emergence, development and manifestation of emotions ... and even speech." 19 Therefore, within the framework of the study of the emotional sphere of a person, a linguistic personality appears in such a significant image as Homo Sentiens, or an emotional person. Reflecting in language, emotions acquire the status of emotiveness. It is impossible to know the functional side of the language to the end without contacting its creator and user in all the diversity of its historical, social, national and other features. Popular ideas about emotions reveal deep insight into the structure of emotions and the nature of emotional life 20 . These representations "crystallize" in the language of emotions, especially in the emotional vocabulary of this language. For example, “the rules for English speakers to use the words grief, remorse, disappointment or shame take into account specific inner feelings that are qualitatively different from each other” 21 . In addition, T.V. Larina draws attention to the open manifestation of emotions, especially negative ones, in the English communicative culture. This is confirmed by the fact that such emotive units as emotional, effusive, demonstrative, excitable, in English have a negative connotation. So, "to characterize a drunk person in English there is a funny idiom - tired and emotional, which literally means tired and emotional." 22 In general, sociological, psychological and linguistic research shows that all people are both "linguistic and emotional animals." 23 Nevertheless, cross-cultural studies of the emotional behavior of representatives of various linguocultural communities are very interesting. For example, comparing the individual and national characteristics of expressing the emotionality of Americans and Russians reveals curious linguistic parallels and contrasts. The emotional styles of Americans and Russians are in tune with their 19 Apresyan Yu. D. The image of a person according to language data: an attempt at a systematic description // Questions of linguistics. - 1995.– No. 1.– P.51. 20 Johnson – Laird P.N.; Oatley K. 1992. Basic emotions, rationality, and folk theory function, folk theory and empirical study. Cognition and Emotion, 6: P. 201-233. 21 Vezhbitskaya A. Language. Culture. Cognition. - M.: Russian dictionaries, 1997.-- S. 345. 22 Larina T.V. Phatic emotives and their role in communication // Emotions in language and speech: Collection of scientific papers / Ed. I.A. Sharonov. M.: RGGU, 2005.-- S. 151. 23 Shakhovsky V.I. Linguistic theory of emotions: Monograph. - M., 2008.-- p. 46. chronotopic national trends. Americans are dominated by "happiness," "complacency," "friendliness," while today's Russians are dominated by "despair," "fear," "anger," "disrespect." However, despite the presence of cultural conditioning in the emotions of a person speaking, it is important to note the existence of universal cross- cultural emotive codes that express an emotional state and at the same time indicate it. Thus, a universal field was established by referring to the variant types of the emotive deictic (indicative) field, represented by the emotive-deictic (indicative) fields of homo sentiens and femina sentien s 24 . In this case, the data of the English and French languages are used as the analysis material. The results of the linguosemiotic analysis are accumulated in the content of the invariant emotive- indicative field. The center of the emotive demonstrative field as a possible tertium comparationis is occupied by interjections, emotional-evaluative adjectives, intensifiers, morphological means of verbalizing emotions, associative-emotive vocabulary and emotive syntactic means that play the role of emotive-symbols and emotive-indices. One of the pronounced features of the emotive indicating field is the ability of units of affective vocabulary, interjections, emotional-evaluative adjectives to become significant components of the central part of the deictic field as emotive symbols. This is due, first of all, to the semantics of affectives, coupled with maximum expressiveness, aimed at the realization of the speech effect, which, in turn, determines the self-sufficiency of the affective-indicative vocabulary, both in language and in speech implementation, from the position of the category of indicating emotivity. The periphery of the invariant deictic field is occupied by figurative emotive signs that correlate with a specific meaning in the semantics of the indicative lexico n 25 . The determined invariant emotive-indicative field allows to prevent communication gaps within the framework of a cross-cultural space. Obviously, emotive semiotics, occupies a central place in the "family of sciences", since without receiving, storing and transmitting information, human life is impossible - neither knowledge of the world, nor the organization of human society and its cultural and linguistic spaces, including the dialogue of cultures. 24 Iskhakova Z.Z. Emotive-deictic constant in the semiosphere: monograph. - M.: FLINT: Nauka, 2014 .-- 352 p. 25 Iskhakova Z.Z. Emotive-deictic constant in the semiosphere: monograph. - M.: FLINT: Nauka, 2014 .-- 352 p. © 2023 Global Journals Volume XXIII Issue III Version I 12 ( ) Global Journal of Human Social Science - Year 2023 C Language, Culture and Emotions in Communication: Semiotic Dimension