Global Journal of Human Social Science, E: Economics, Volume 22 Issue 4

number of professionals, academics, activists, and policymakers, committed to the consolidation of experiences for the systematization of tools that provide the empirical application of a new economic logic (Compère & Schoenmaeckers, 2021). The SSE is derived from fields of a plural economy and has the objective of proposing new perspectives towards the inversion of the subalternity of work in relation to capital. In Europe, one of the economic fields that form the SSE, with extensive consolidated academic production, is Social Economy (Defourny & Monzón, 1992; Monzón, 2003; Laville, 2004; Mendiguren, Etxezarreta & Guridi, 2009; Draperi, 2013; Mendiguren & Etxezaretta, 2015; Sá, 2016, 2017) which can be defined as an economic sector of production or circulation of goods and services that does not have profitability as its main objective (VIDAL E GARCÍA, 2006). In Latin America, the Solidarity Economy (Ecosol) (Laville, 1994; Singer, 1999, 2002; Kraychete, 2000; Gaiger, 2002, 2013, 2014, 2019; Gaiger & Kuyven, 2020; França-Filho, 2002; França-Filho, 2006) has a temporal trajectory concomitant with the reforms in policies to promote family farming in Brazil. Unlike the Social Economy as an economic sector, Ecosol consists of a set of guiding principles for the economic organization and social inclusion of certain groups, with the aim of breaking the isolation of small and micro- enterprises. (SINGER, 1999). Since the last quarter of the 20th century, Ecosol has permeated important discussions for the establishment of alternatives that represent new production and consumption paradigms. The reference text of the III CONAES (2014, p.5) brings as one of Ecosol's key points, the social valorisation of work as a producer of direct implications for the development of men and women's capacities and the overcoming of the subalternity of work in relation to the capital. Ecosol's field includes cooperatives and other forms of social enterprises, self-help groups, community organizations, formal and informal economy workers' associations, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and other civil society organizations that ensure the provision of services, finance initiatives solidarity, among others (Morais, 2013; 2014). In Brazil, the national representation of cooperatives is divided between the Organization of Cooperatives of Brazil (OCB) and the National Union of Solidarity Cooperative Organizations (UNICOPAS), the latter which now brings together the main sectoral confederations of cooperatives and Ecosol associations. The OCB has under its national unified representation, in 2018, approximately 7 thousand cooperatives, of which 1.6 thousand are linked to the agricultural sector (OCB, 2019), mostly from the south and southeast of the country, with emphasis on the national production of cooperatives in grain monoculture, such as peanuts, soybeans and corn. At UNICOPAS, in turn, more than 2,500 organizations among cooperatives and associations are linked to the 4 cooperative centres, incorporating rural social agents such as farmers and family farmers, settlers and settlers of agrarian reform, indigenous peoples, riverine peoples, quilombolas (maroons) and gatherers, with greater representation in the north of the country. c) The FF & SSE intersection assumptions With trajectories and history of achievements of the base and now, with the advent of the SDGs, the internationalization of both concepts presents some intersections. The intersections between FF and SSE are materialized in the following evidence: a) we are in the decade of FF, b) public policies and development strategies in FF can impact 78% for the fulfilment of the SDGs in the territories, c) The SSE a tool for transposing the SDGs and d) the SSE projects are a representative part of the total FF enterprises in the country. There is a need, however, to clarify whether the science (as a systematic set of knowledge) that underpins these categories also presents trends of intersection, in the search for the theoretical construction of a new paradigm of production and consumption, following the trends of the international political agenda. Although this trend is observable in the intellectual and political fields, it would still be necessary to show whether such intersections are taking place in the economic field in different territories, beyond the multilateral discourses and agendas. Thus, based on these premises, the guiding question of the study was defined as: “What are the theoretical-methodological intersections and the trend of scientific production on the categories Social and Solidarity Economy and Family Farming?” Therefore, the objective of the study was to identify trends in scientific production on the categories Family Farming and Social and Solidarity Economy. II. M ethods In a comprehensive way, the historical approach (Bachelard, 1996) was adopted as an epistemological line, in the sense that it was only possible to understand the trend of the discussions and the transformations of the SSE and the AF through a process of reflection that considered the logical, ideological, and historical. In line with the historical approach, the construction of the analysis tool presupposes that all the specific methods of collection, processing and analysis that will be adopted begin with the problems presented and specific hypotheses to solve them. This FF and SSE representativeness analysis tool followed an adaptation of the PRISMA Method (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyse). The PRISMA guidelines guide the © 2022 Global Journals Volume XXII Issue IV Version I 3 ( ) Global Journal of Human Social Science - Year 2022 E Systematic Review of the Literature on Family Farming and the Social and Solidarity Economy in Brazil and Latin America