Global Journal of Human Social Science, E: Economics, Volume 22 Issue 4

environment, one being necessary to the other. Family Farming can now be considered an established paradigm at the national level and the Social and Solidarity Economy, in turn, presents itself as a new paradigm at the national level and has already permeated academic discussions at the Ibero-American level. Finally, in response to the research question in this chapter about “what are the theoretical- methodological intersections and the trend of scientific production on the categories Social and Solidarity Economy and Family Farming?”, the trend at the intersection between FF and SSE has: i) as a consolidated Area of Knowledge: productions on Socioeconomics, with a clear growth of productions on Productive Inclusion, Sustainable Development and Sustainability Indicators and ii) as Areas of Knowledge on the rise: productions on Food Security, mainly on topics such as Organic Foods and Agroecology; Public Policy productions on topics such as the PNAE, Social Transformations and Social Technologies. In short, it was found that the scientific production on these two categories is, in fact, consolidating in recent years, as well as the intersection between them has been configured as an academic, social and political field relevant to the achievement of the objectives of sustainable development of the Global Agenda 2030. © 2022 Global Journals Volume XXII Issue IV Version I 11 ( ) Global Journal of Human Social Science - Year 2022 E Systematic Review of the Literature on Family Farming and the Social and Solidarity Economy in Brazil and Latin America A cknowledgments This article received financial support via Public Notice PAINTER 003/2020 from the public agency FAPEAM and is the result of work supported by the public agency CAPES. R eferences R éférences R eferencias 1. Alcantara, L. C. S., Sampaio, C. A. C., Uriarte, L. (2018). Experiencia Cooperativa de Mondragón: la educación cooperativa como un proceso de transformación social. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 93, 181-209. 2. Amorim, A. L. B. D., ROSSO, V. V. D., & Bandoni, D. H. (2016). Acquisition of family farm foods for school meals: Analysis of public procurements within rural family farming published by the cities of São Paulo state. Revista de Nutrição, 29, 297-306. 3. April-Lalonde, G., Latorre, S., Paredes, M., Hurtado, M. F., Muñoz, F., Deaconu, A., ... & Batal, M. (2020). Characteristics and motivations of consumers of direct purchasing channels and the perceived barriers to alternative food purchase: A cross- sectional study in the Ecuadorian Andes. Sustainability, 12(17), 6923. 4. Bachelard, G. (1996). A formação do espírito científico. Rio de janeiro: Contraponto, 1938. 5. Baumel, A. & Basso, L. C. (2004). Agricultura familiar e a sustentabilidade da pequena propriedade rural. In: CAMARGO, G., CAMARGO FILHO, M. & FÁVARO, J. L. (Eds.) Experiências em desenvolvimento sustentável e agricultura familiar. Guarapuava – Paraná: Ed. Unicentro. 6. Bautista, L. A. N., & Sardá, H. T. (2017). Economía Popular Solidaria: Un acercamiento desde el contexto cubano actual/Popular Solidarity Economy: an Approach from the Current Cuban Context. Estudios del Desarrollo Social: Cuba y América Latina, 5(3), 100-115. 7. Berdegue, J. (2020). Open letter from Julio Berdegue, FAO Regional Representative. Decade of Family Farming. FAO in Brazil: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2019. Available at: www.fao.org/brasil/noticias/detail-events/pt/c/12 06221/. 8. BM – Banco Mundial. (2020a). Informe semestral de la región de América Latina y el Caribe: La economía en los tiempos del COVID-19. 9. BM - Banco Mundial. (2020b). Agricultura - Datos Agricultura, valor agregado (% del PIB) - Brazil. Datos sobre las cuentas nacionales del Banco Mundial y archivos de datos sobre cuentas nacionales de la OCDE. 2020. 10. Bono, J. R. G., & Baranda, M. R. T. (2019). Los valores de la Economía Social como impulsores del cambio en clústeres con fuerte fragmentación del conocimiento: el caso de la caña de azúcar de Veracruz (México). 11. BRASIL, Sistema Nacional do Comércio Justo e Solidário. Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego. Decreto Executivo Nº 7.358 de 17 de novembro de 2010. 12. BRASIL - Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. (2012). Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Diretrizes metodológicas: elaboração de revisão sistemática e metanálise de ensaios clínicos randomizados. Série Normas e Manuais Técnicos. Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília: Editora do Ministério da Saúde, 92p. 13. Buralli, R. J., Ribeiro, H., Mauad, T., Amato- Lourenço, L. F., Salge, J. M., Diaz-Quijano, F. A., ... & Guimarães, J. R. D. (2018). Respiratory condition of family farmers exposed to pesticides in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(6), 1203. 14. Burneo, V. F. G., & Sánchez, G. M. D. (2018). Sistemas de relaciones de producción de participación social y comunitaria como base del desarrollo sustentable. Cooperativismo y Desarrollo: COODES, 6(2), 125-140.