Global Journal of Management and Business Research, A: Administration and Management, Volume 22 Issue 1

R eferences R éférences R eferencias 1. Alt, R. Beck, R. and Smits, M.T. (2018) Fintech and the transformation of the financial service industry. Electronic Markets 28:235 -243. https://doi.org// 10.1007/s12525-018-0310-9 (Accessed: 01 October 2021). 2. Chin W.W, 1998. Commentary Issues and Opinion on structural equation modelling. MIS quarterly 22 (1), 1998 pp vii -xvi 3. Curtis, L.et al (2010) Adoption of social media for public relations by nonprofit organizations. Public Relations Review. 36 (1): 90–92. doi:10.1016/j. pubrev.2009.10.003 (Accessed: 01 October 2021). 4. Fornell C & Larcker D.F, 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with unobservable varibales and measurement error. J. Mark Res. 1981, 18, 39 -50 5. Gefen D, Straub D & Boudreau M.C 2000. Structural Equation Modelling and Regression: Guidelines for Research practice. Communications of the association for Information Students. 4 (1), 2000. Pp 7. 6. Hyun-Sun, R. (2018) Understanding Benefit and Risk Framework of Fintech Adoption: comparison of early adopters and late adopters. Proceedings of the 51 st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 7. Koivimäki, T. Ristola, A. and Kesti, M. (2007) The perceptions towards mobile services: An empirical analysis of the role of use facilitators. Personal & Ubiquitous Computing. 12 (1): 67–75. doi:1 0.1007/ s00779-006-0128-x. S2CID 6089360(Accessed: 01 October 2021) 8. Lin, C. and Anol, B. (2008) Learning online social support: An investigation of network information technology. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 11 (3): 268–272. doi:1 0.1089/cpb.2007.0057. PMID 18537 495. (Accessed: 01 October 2021). 9. Kline R.B 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press. 10. Kline R.B 2016. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York. The Guilford Press. 11. Noofa B, Kevin L & Adel S, 2020. Investigation of Fintech services adoption in Banking Industry. Doi:10.2139/ssrn.3659074. 12. Odoyo, C.O et al (2016) Theory of Reasoned Action as an underpinning to technological Innovation adoption studies. World Journal of Computer Application and Technology, 4(1): 1 -7, 2016. DOI:10.13189/wjeat.2016.040101. (Accessed: 01 October 2021). 13. Sykes, T. A.Venkatesh, V. and Gosain, S. (2009) Model of acceptance with peer support: A social network perspective to understand employees' system use". MIS Quarterly. 33 (2): 371–393. doi: 10.2307/20650296. JSTOR 20650296. (Accessed: 01 October 2021). 14. Wang, H. W and Wang, S.H. (2010) User acceptance of mobile Internet based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: Investigating the determinants and gender differences". Social Behavior & Personality. 38 (3): 415–426.doi:10.2224/sbp.2010.38.3.415.(Accessed: 01 October 2021) 15. Welch et al (2020)USING THE UNIFIED THEORY OF ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF TECHNOLOGY (UTAUT) MODEL TO DETERMINE FACTORS AFFECTING MOBILE LEARNING ADOPTION IN THE WORKPLACE: A STUDY OF THE SCIENCE MUSEUM GROUP" (PDF). International Journal on Computer Science and Information Systems. 15 (1): 85–98. Retrieved 4 June 2021. 16. Yasin M, Augusto M, Alavi J and Lisboa J, 2009. A SEM approach to assessing the effectiveness of quality improvement initiatives in service organizations: A systematic perspective. International journal of Business and Systems Research 3(3): 372 - 386 26 Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XXII Issue I Version I Year 2022 ( ) A © 2022 Global Journals Discussion on Fintech Adoption Research