Global Journal of Management and Business Research, A: Administration and Management, Volume 22 Issue 4

d) The Structural Model Validity - Final Result Table 5 provides a Structural Model (Final Result) Table 5: Structural Model -Final Result Goodness of Fit Measures Name of Index Model Result Remark Chi-Square χ 2 1767.126 Accepted Degrees of Freedom DF 692 Accepted Chi-Square/ Degrees of Freedom χ 2 /DF 2.554 Accepted Comparative Fit Index CFI 0.919 Accepted Tucker Lewis Index TLI 0.913 Accepted Root -Mean- Square- Error-of Approximation RMSEA 0.057 Accepted e) Structural Model Summary The results of structural’ model using the AMOS software, shows that DF was 692 (it should be more than 0), χ 2 /DF has a value of 2.554, that is less than 2.0 (it should be less than or equal 2.0 or 3). The RMSEA was 0.057 (it should be less than 0.08). The TLI index was 0.913 which is very close to 1.0 (a value of 1.0 indicates perfect fit). The CFI was 0.919. All indices are close to a value of 1.0 in CFA, indicating that the measurement models provide good support for the factor structure determined through the CFA as reported in Table 5. f) Direct Effects Table 6 and Fig.2 present the results; the individual tests of significance of the relationship amid the variables. It reveals that, as expected HRIS have a positive influence on HC ( β = 0.772, CR (Critical Ratio) = 13.774, CR > 1.96, p = 0.000, p<0.05). Therefore, (H1: There is a positive significant relationship amid HRIS and HC) is supported. These results support the findings and being matched with Savalam and Dadhabai (2018). However, these results don’t match those observed in Weeks (2013) study. Moreover, pertaining to H2: There is a positive significant relationship amid HC and O.P is supported as the result shows that ( β = 0. 385, CR (Critical Ratio) = 7.304, CR > 1.96, p = 0.000, p<0.05), as it predicts that "There is a significant relationship amid HC and O.P". These results of H2 are in line with those of previous studies of Jamaland Saif (2011), Mahmood et al. (2014), and Sarwar, et al. (2020). Furthermore, H2 is consistent with Seleim et al. (2007). The result shows that H3: There is a positive significant relationship amid HRIS and O.P. ( β = 0. 398, CR (Critical Ratio) = 7.035, CR > 1.96, p = 0.000, p<0.05) is supported, as it predicts that "There is a positive significant relationship amid HRIS and O.P". This result of H3 ties well with previous studies wherein found in Broderick R. and Boudreau (1992) research. Furthermore a similar conclusion was reached by Nisha and Mona (2012). In addition, this is consistent with what has been found in research of Michael et al. (2012). A similar pattern of results was obtained in Nikhal A. K. (2013). Those findings are directly in line with previous findings of Talebi & al; (2014). On other hand, those results of H3 don’t match with those found in Sira, Wayne (2011) research. Table 6: Hypothesized Path of the Final Structural Equation Model Hypothesized path Estimate Critical Ratio (C.R) P-Value HC  HRIS 0.772 13.774 0.00 O.P  HC 0.385 7.304 0.00 O.P  HRIS 0.398 7.035 0.00 Results shown in Table 7 show that the estimated structural model corroborated the three hypotheses, as HRIS statements constructs explained 52.8 % of HC variance (R² = 0.528), Besides, HRIS statements through HC explained 57 % of O.P variance (R² = 0.570). Table 7: Squared Multiple Correlations Variable Squared Multiple Correlations(R²) HC 0.528 O.P 0.570 Human Resources Information System Impact on Organization Performance: The Roles of Human Capital and HR Analytics 64 Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XXII Issue IV Version I Year 2022 ( ) A © 2022 Global Journals