Global Journal of Management and Business Research, A: Administration and Management, Volume 22 Issue 6

the specific case-where there is a clear vision and an innovative idea. They can also understand how the structure needs to be adapted to produce heterogeneous aspirations, such as continuous production of innovation, etc. As it turned out, Tesla relied on a traditional model, with low working autonomy. But this requires the existence of an "enlightened leadership" (with a specific vision, etc.), which is extremely rare. This case must be understood by the average organism, as an extreme case, “or as the average physicist approaches Einstein”. It should not be an example of imitation, but of course it should be studied in depth, so that there are valuable lessons. VII. E pilogue Building an organizational structure is a fluid and extremely complex process. A deep understanding of the organization can be the key to choosing a structure that allows better communication, transparency and accountability, as well as effective monitoring of management processes. The size, resources, mission of the organization, as well as variables related to human resources, must be taken into account, in order to understand and familiarize all executives with the aspirations of the organization and the roles they are called to adopt.A weak or mismatched structure can stifle work, on a deeper level, which over time will affect the organizational performance. As noted, the structure may involve combinations of different capabilities, levels and resources. It can concern and connect different people, from maybe different countries, cultures etc. B ibliography 1. Akande. O. O and Ojokuku R. M,, (2008), Basic principle of management a text for management, published by apex books limited. Pg8 2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639 101700108 3. Bolman, L.G., and T.E. Deal, (1997). Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership. Josse Bass; San Francisco. 4. Bernd, V., (2007).Ten Organizational Structure and Control, Berlin School of Economics. 5. Chegini M. G, Yousefi .S and Rastad .S, (2013) Competitive Study of Effects About Dimensions of Organizational Structure on Productivity. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, Text road Publication, ISBN 2090-4304. Pg318-326. 6. Child, J., (2005). Organization: Contemporary principles and practice, Blackwell Publishing 7. Csaszar, Stephen M., Arbor A and Michigan, (2012).Organizational Structure as A Determinant of Performance: Evidence from Mutual Funds, U.S.A, Published Online Early view In Wiley Online Library (Wileyonlinelibrary.Com). 8. Eze, A., O. Bello & Adekola, A. (2017). The effects of organizational structure on the performance of organizations. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research 5(6), pp.46-62, 9. Fourweekmba, (2022). Tesla Business Model Analysis 2022. At: https://fourweekmba.com/tesla- business-model/ 10. Grant, R. (2015). Knowledge-Based View. At: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom120 172 11. Hall, H., (1987). Organizations: Structures, processes, and outcomes, Prentice-Hal, Englewood Cliffs. 12. Joris, M., J. Maryse and M. Marco, (2002).Business and Policy Research. Organisational Structure and Performance in Dutch SMEs. 13. Κόντρα , Α . και Θεοφανίδης , Μ . (2014). Κοινωνικές και οικονομικές εξελίξεις α π ό την εισαγωγή των ηλεκτροκίνητων αυτοκινήτων στην αγορά , ανάλυση π ερί π τωσης Tesla Inc. Στο : http://eureka.teithe.gr/ jspui/bitstream/123456789/11729/1/Kontra- Theofanidis.pdf 14. McShane, S., and V. Glinow, (2007).Organizational Behaviour: Essentials, McGraw –Hill U.S.A. 15. Mintzberg, H., (1983). Designing Effective Organizations, Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey. 16. Mohammed, F., and Saleh, F, (2013). International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research: Surveying the Impact of Organization Structure on Employee’s Job Satisfaction of Agricultural Bank in Ardebil Province. 17. Nelson, D., and J. Quick, (2011).Understanding organizational behavior, Mason, OH: Southwestern Cengage Learning. 18. Ogbo, A., Chibueze, N., Orga C. C. &Igwe A. (2015). Impact of structure on organizational performance of selected technical and service firms in Nigeria. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1), 2015. 19. Owolabi Y. L. and Kingsley C. C. (2007).Evaluation of leadership and Organizational Performance in Small Scale industries in Nigeria; A Case of Selected Small Scale industries, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Master’s Thesis, pg 9 Sweden. 20. Παζό π ουλος , Β . (2014). Η συναρ π αστική ιστορία της Tesla. Στο : https://www.capital.gr/arthra/2100088/i- sunarpastiki-istoria-tis-tesla 21. Quinn, E, (1988). Beyond rational management, Jossey Bass, San Francisco. 22. Ranson, S., B. Hinings, and R. Greenwood, (1980).Administrative Science Quarterly. 23. Rajaeepour S, Azizollah. A, Mahmoud Z. and Shokouhi.S. (2012) Relationship between organizational structure and organizational 38 Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XXII Issue VI Version I Year 2022 ( ) A © 2022 Global Journals Organizational Structure as a Fundamental Function of Effective Management. The Case of Tesla