Global Journal of Management and Business Research, A: Administration and Management, Volume 22 Issue 7

V. C onclusion and R ecommendation a) Conclusion Based on the result and findings of the study, the researcher concluded the following: 1. Respondents were Bachelor of Science in Agri- Business, 4 th year college business students, 23-25 year’s old, Cebuano and single. 2. Business students manifested entrepreneurial intentions often times. The same manifestation with subjective norms, attitude towards becoming entrepreneur and perceived behavioral control. 3. Entrepreneurial intentions of the business students were weak and strong positively affected by subjective norms and attitude towards becoming entrepreneur, respectively. Perceived behavioral control was affected by subjective norms. 4. Business students encountered financial problem. b) Recommendation Based on the finding of this study, the following recommendation are given: 1. Establish business center for experiential activities for the business students. 2. Business students need to attend the management training about business and invite successful businessman to be a guest speaker. 3. School need more review to the syllabus base on the variables of the particular subject. L iterature C ited 1. Ajzen, I.2011. Attitudes, personality, and behavior . McGraw-Hill Education (UK). 2. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. 2010. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta ‐ analytic review. British journal of Social psychology , 40 (4), 471-499. 3. Audretsch, D. B., Bönte, W., & Keilbach, M. 2012. Entrepreneurship capital and its impact on knowledge diffusion and economic performance. Journal of business venturing , 23 (6), 687-698. Bruhn, M. 2011. License to sell: the effect of business registration reform on entrepreneurial activity in Mexico . The World Bank. 5. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A.2013. The regulation of entry. The quarterly Journal of economics , 117 (1), 1-37. 6. Engle, R. 2010. Entrepreneurial intent: A twelve- country evaluation of Ajzen's model of planned behavior. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research , 16 (1), 35-57. 7. Elfving, J., Brännback, M., & Carsrud, A. 2009. Toward a contextual model of entrepreneurial intentions. In Understanding the entrepreneurial mind (pp. 23-33). Springer, New York, NY. 8. Gartner, W. B.2011. What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? Journal of Business venturing , 5 (1), 15-28. 9. Iakovleva, T., Kolvereid, L., & Stephan, U. 2011. Entrepreneurial intentions in developing and developed countries. Education+Training , 53 (5), 353-370. 10. Krueger Jr, 2013. Competing models of entrepreneurial lintentions. Journal of business venturing , 15 (5-6), 411-432. 11. Liñán, F., & Santos, F. J. 2010. Does social capital affect entrepreneurial intentions?. International Advances in Economic Research , 13 (4), 443-453. 12. MacMillan, I. C., & Katz, J. 2010. Idiosyncratic milieus of entrepreneurial research: The need for comprehensive theories. 13. Ritsilä, J., & Tervo, H.2010. Effects of unemployment on new firm formation: Micro-level panel data evidence from Finland. Small business economics , 19 (1), 31-40. 14. Shaver, K. G., & Scott, L. R.2011. Ô Person, process, choice: The psychology of new venture creation Õ. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice , 91 (16), 23-45. 15. Souitaris, V., 2010. Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business venturing , 22 (4), 566-591. Entrepreneurial Intention of Business Students in Davao Del Sur State College 32 Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XXII Issue VII Version I Year 2022 ( ) A © 2022 Global Journals 4.