Global Journal of Management and Business Research, A: Administration and Management, Volume 22 Issue 9

were genetically related, homosexuality was totally unknown. Missionaries report that when they were translating the Bible into Dani for this group, their tribal assistants, who knew their own culture intimately, were nonplused by references to homosexuality in Romans 1; they did not understand the concept. Another missionary, with the same group for 25 years, overheard many jests and sexually ribald exchanges among the men, but never a single mention of homosexuality in all that time. When Dani went to help with missionary work among the Sambia, they were astounded at some of the homosexual practices they saw for the first time. Although it is always difficult for a foreigner to be completely sure whether a rare and stigmatized behavior exists, it is certainly true that if three such different experiences of homosexuality can occur in groups of people so closely related genetically, genetically enforced homosexuality is an impossibility. ” 45 Science has not yet discovered any genetically dictated behavior in humans. So far, genetically dictated behaviors of the “one-gene-one-trait” variety have been found only in very simple organisms. From an understanding of gene structure and function there are no plausible means by which genes could inescapably force homosexual behaviors on a person. 46 No genetically determined human behavior has yet been found. The most closely genetically related behavior yet discovered (mono-amine oxidase deficiency leading to aggression) has shown itself remarkably responsive to counselling. If homosexual behaviours were genetically inherited, it would have bred itself out of the population in only several generations, and would not be around today. 47 This means that gays with no children would not be able to reproduce their genes.In general, geneticists settle for some genetic influence of rather undefined degree, most agreeing that many genes contribute to any particular human behavior. Geneticists, anthropologists, developmental psychologists, sociologists, endocrinologists, neuroanatomists, medical researchers into gender, and twin study researchers are in broad agreement about an infinitesimal(insignificant) role of genetics in homosexuality . 48 . However, genes do not make anyone engage in homosexual behavior. There is no genetic determinism, and genetic influence at most is minor. 49 Is this consensus likely to change? Might some major biological link be discovered which could change everything? After all, science is about discovery. For most of these scientific disciplines, the findings have been clearly established from facts that will not change (e.g. the diversity of homosexual practices between and within cultures; the clearly established stages of human development; the over-riding role of upbringing in the ultimate gender choice of people with ambiguous genitalia). 50 But what of future studies of brain micro- structure, or detailed analysis of genes and function? Will they reveal links between brain structure and human behaviours, or behaviours and genetic sequences? Of course that is a huge possibility. New research findings will continue to be published. But, one can safely conclude that even authors wanting to find such links will almost always include the standard scientific caveats that the influence is minor, and that the environment is pivotal . 51 Thus, what can reasonably be said about future researches is that it will enter new fields and come up with new links, but none of them will be definitive . 52 1. They would be admitting that there are those in the homosexual community who, after careful thought, have concluded that it is wrong to be homosexual and that it does not lead to personal happiness and fulfillment. Focusing on those homosexuals who want to change continues to emphasize the immorality and personal destructiveness of homosexuality. Based on the alleged, though unproven, genetic links to homosexuality, most homosexuals claim that their homosexuality is so much a part of their identity, that they can do nothing about it. In his report, "Homosexuality in America: Exposing the Myths," Richard Howe suggests two major reasons why homosexual activists promote this myth: 2. They would be denying that homosexuality is physically caused. The more the homosexual community can convince the general public that their homosexuality is beyond their control, the more tolerance or even preferential treatment they can gain in public policy." 53 Quite sim Contrary to the myth stated above, in truth there is no gay gene! Even openly homosexual researchers have come to that conclusion. In 1996, a 74 Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XXII Issue IX Version I Year 2022 ( ) A © 2022 Global Journals The Ethical Emotivism of A. J. Ayer and C. L. Stevenson: A Tendentious Explanatory Matrix for Human Homosexual Behaviour 45 Neil and Briar Whitehead, (1999) My Genes Made Me Do It! - A Scientific Look at Sexual Orientation , (Los Angeles: Huntington House Publishers), pp. 87-88. 46 Miranda Lambert (2004) “A Sourcebook for Homosexuality [REVIEW]” The Classical Review 54 (2):439-441. 47 Ellen T. Armour (2010) “Blinding Me with (Queer) Science: Religion, Sexuality, and (Post?) Modernity [REVIEW]” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1-3):107-109. 48 John F. Harvey (1996) “Homosexual Orientation & Genetics ,” Ethics and Medics 21 (5):1-2. 49 Fabrizzio Mc Manus (2012) “The Structure of Explanations and Counter-Explanations of Homosexuality,” Open Journal of Philosophy 2 (4):235-237. 50 Charles Weijer, (1996) “Queer Science: The Use and Abuse of Research into Homosexuality,” British Medical Journal , Volume 313, Issue 7063: 1017. 51 Damiano Migliorini (2020) “Towards an Ethics of Sexual Differences,” Ricerca Psicoanalitica 31 (2):161-163. 52 Dean Bryd, Shirley E. Cox, Jeffery W. Robinson, “The Innate- Immutable Argument Finds No Basis in Science,” In Their own Words: Gay Activists Speak about Science, Morality, and Philosophy. Available at: http://www.narth.com/docs/innate.html , 30 September 2002. Accessed on October 7, 2022. 53 Richard G. Howe (1994) “Homosexuality in America: Exposing the Myths,” American Family Association Journal , Vol. 18, No. 10: 13-15.