Global Journal of Management and Business Research, A: Administration and Management, Volume 23 Issue 5

Ahmad Gashamoglu Author: Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology. e-mail: ahmgmm@gmail.com Summary- The article examines a number of propositions of the Ahangyol theory proposed by the author in the field of management of business entities. The theory is gaining increasing recognition in the scientific world these days. Proposals are made on the main conditions for creating a harmonious situation in a business entity and how to meet these conditions. Using the “4-energy” provision of the Ahangyol theory, the author identifies he key components for the existence and operation of each business entity. The proposed mathematical model can help reveal the latent factors that cause failures of business entities. Keywords: “business entity”, “management”, “ahangyol”, “system power”, “energy”, “latent opportunities”. I. Introduction ach business entity can be characterized by a certain system. Therefore, the use of every new scientific theory and the results obtained that may facilitate the development and enrichment of the system can contribute a lot to management in this field. The Ahangyol theory [1] proposed by the author and supported by renowned American scientist L. Zade [2] can prove very beneficial in this field. It is known that a business entity exists and operates in the form of interactions of certain elements and subsystems. Obviously, if these interactions are arranged in a harmonious manner, the business entity will function more successfully. According to the science of Ahangyol, these interactions can be harmonious only if the following conditions are met: 1. All the elements and subsystems should work towards a common goal. In other words, they should all serve the same purpose. Therefore, the management of a business entity should keep this issue in the spotlight. This can be done with the help of the state-of-the-art Scientific Center, various sociological, psychological and other studies. If a different position is observed in any element or subsystem, this position should be deeply studied, analyzed, and conclusions should be drawn before tension arises. If there are any benefits in this difference, they should be utilized. 2. The business entity should have sufficient resources to achieve the set goal, and these resources should form a complete and integrated system. The available capabilities and resources of elements and subsystems should complement each other. In order to achieve the overall objective, what one element or subsystem lacks should be available in others. If such an opportunity or resource is not available in the existing structure, the goals should be modified to one for which there are sufficient resources. Alternatively, the business entity itself should be modified by introducing new elements and creating subsystems. It is necessary to bring the business entity to a state in which its resources can achieve that goal by creating a complete system. If the resources are not sufficient to achieve the goal, this should be explained to those who have a different position and they should be required to take a position commensurate with available resources. Those still disagreeing should be removed and replaced with others. 3. Each subsystem and element of the business entity should have the right to require others to undertake activity necessary to achieve the common goal. This right should be exercised in a moderate and tension-free manner. In other words, everyone representing the business entity and all of its teams should be able to request others to perform better to achieve the common goal and, if necessary, help them in this work. This request should comply with high ethical standards, be in accordance with general norms, no-one should take offence and no tension should be created. 4. In order to achieve the common goal, the activity of each person should help and strengthen the activity of others. Everyone and all teams should have the power to raise issues with the governing body to improve the activities of those hindering the overall performance. In order to organize management more successfully, let's first pay attention to the essence of the concept of “system power”, which is used and investigated in the Ahangyol theory. Unfortunately, the concept of “system power” is not investigated sufficiently in scientific literature. Perhaps the main reason for this is the fact that the concept of “power” is not comprehensively studied in philosophy [4]. In the science of Ahangyol, the power of a system refers to a set of its capabilities. It should be noted that this concept should not be confused with the concept of “potential energy” or “kinetic energy” of a system or entity. When talking of the “power of a business entity”, E 27 Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XXIII Issue V Version I Year 2023 ( ) A © 2023 Global Journals Use of the Ahangyol Theory in the Management of Business Entities