Global Journal of Management and Business Research, B: Economics and Commerce, Volume 21 Issue 5

this study is based on modeling the specifics of the knowledge component of the student's self-organization process. As a result, the student must acquire the ability to independently overcome psychological and cognitive barriers in learning. In addition, using the example of Russia, the authors structured statistical data illustrating the mechanism of socialization of students in the process of their self-organization and calculated the economic effect. In the results and discussion, the authors describe the second component of the dialectic of personality self-organization - its socialization, highlighting the skills group from those proposed by the World Economic Forum (2015) and the World Bank (2018) experts, which characterize it. In fact, having learned to overcome all possible barriers in the process of education and socialization at the stage of his self- organization, an individual is able to achieve a state of success not only in professional activity, but also in organizing his life in society. These qualities are typical for intellectually autonomous individuals capable of unlimited self-development. A critical mass of such persons, capable of creativity in the profession and in life, happy in the society due to the coincidence of their individual values and socially accepted norms, will become the main participants of the processes of system formation of post-pandemic reality. II. M ethodology In order to establish the connection and interdependence of the fundamental problems that became apparent thanks to the COVID-19 pandemic, the authors had to form their own logic of theoretical research, which allowed them to ultimately solve the puzzle of disparate, incoherent parts of human-created systemic integrities. First of all, the authors have adopted the dialectical method of research, which allowed the classics (Hegel, 1892; Marx, and Engels, 1955-1974) to obtain important results in their scientific work. The choice turned out to be successful, since the authors got a completely unique chance to substantiate static reversible changes in system integrity at the stage of their self-organization, and to link the dynamics of systems with irreversible cardinal (fundamental) transformations of their elements and the formation of new structures. As a result, it became possible to understand the predetermination of changes in systems at the stage of their self-organization under the influence of the dialectical laws of unity and struggle of opposites and the one of the transition of quantitative changes into qualitative ones, , and at the stage of self-development – of the law of double negation. Deepening into the problem of self-movement of human-made systemic integrities, the authors developed a hypothesis about dialectical connection and conditioning not only of elements, a system and its structure, but also of all systems among themselves. To prove it, there were involved philosophical principles of knowledge (B.M. Kedrov, 1963; A.P. Sheptulin, 1957; A.A. Zinoviev, 1960) and the logic of materialist dialectics, which is associated with the names of prominent representatives of the German philosophy - Immanuel Kant (1781); Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling (1993), and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1892, 1967) as well as the findings of such brilliant thinkers as К . Marx (1995); Vladimir I. Vernadsky (1967), Ludwig Heinrich Edler von Mises (1998), Friedrich August von Hayek (1991), Fernand Braudel (1981), and etc. As a result, the use of dialectical logic in the study of the economy and society made it possible to discover in them the identity of the processes of self-organization and self-development, predetermined by the above mentioned dialectical laws (Pilipenko, et al., 2021a, 2021b). From a philosophical point of view, the repetition of certain phenomena makes it possible to assume that they are associated with objectively operating mechanisms within the framework of systemic integrity. To prove the validity of these conclusions and to identify the essence and forms of systemic integrities, it became necessary to take into account the provisions substantiated by the creators and developers of such theoretical concepts as general systems theory (H. Hacken, 1977), synergetics (Ludwig von Bertalanffy, 1968), tectology (A.A. Bogdanov, 1934), the catastrophe theory (V.I. Arnold, 1975, 1979; J. Guckenheimer, 1973; E.C. Zeeman, 1977; R. Thom, 1969; 1974; and etc.), theory of large cycles of economic conjuncture (N.D. Kondratiev, 1984), as well as the modern theory of complexity economics (W. Brian Arthur, 1999; Arthur, et al., 1997; Anderson, et al., 1988; Hausmann, et al., 1996), etc. The search for an integrating principle, dialectically mediating the interaction of economic and social systems, led the authors to the idea that it is a person who is the centre around which the human- created systemic organizations revolve in the economy, society, and technology. The approach to man as a self- sufficient system made it possible to dialectically link education and socialization as a specific feature of the individual's self-organization. As for the phenomenon of intellectually autonomous personality, it is associated with the beginning of human self-development. On this difficult path, the works of outstanding humanist thinkers of the present and the past became a huge help, which allowed the authors to build the general outlines of the model of human-created system organizations that unite differentiated types of economic activity and separate individuals in society. It is about V.I. Vernadsky (1960, 2018); L.N. Gumilev (2012a; Gumilev, 2012b), Gary Stanley Becker, (1985, 1993); Theodore W. Schultz (1960); Jacob Mincer, and Solomon Polachek (1995). To understand the deep psychological patterns of changes in the essence of education, the authors were forced to Uncertainty of the Post-Covid Future: How will Humanity Solve this Puzzle? © 2021 Global Journals 47 Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XXI Issue V Version I Year 2021 ( ) B