Global Journal of Management and Business Research, B: Economics and Commerce, Volume 21 Issue 5

fact, the subjective component mediates the coincidence / non-coincidence of the value ideas of individuals with socially accepted values that are institutionalized by the state. The authors used the model of dynamical sets are self-affiliated within the framework of the theory of sets with self-affiliation (Mirimanoff, 1917; Chechulin, 2012). If the dynamic sets A and B represent the values of the individual and the values (social norms) of society, then their intersection allows us to describe the mechanism of strengthening / destroying the system integrity both in the economy and in society (Fig. 4). Source: The authors’ development Figure 4: A model representation of the interaction of individuals and systemic wholes on the example of the economy, taking into account the segments of the intersection of the value concepts of subjects and social norms that dominate in society In this example, the change in the segments of the intersection of dynamic sets illustrates how the structural connections of dialectically related subjects and systemic integrities change. As long as the subjects are satisfied with the “social behavioural norms” in economic and social systems, their interests vary from 100% coincidence to 50% (Fig. 4). Under this condition, the stability of the self-organizing systems is strengthened. It is described with the help of interests of sellers and buyers in the economic system. In Fig. 4 such a state is described by a white arrow with parameters 0. Otherwise, the divergence of interests of subjects and society, the integrity of systemic formations becomes more and more fragile. As a result, the authors linked the system formation in the economy and society with the subjectivization of their structural ties. This means that the value parameters of individuals and their agreement / disagreement with society as a whole play a cardinal role in strengthening the integrity of self-organizing systems and in their destruction. Moreover dialectical logic forced the authors to consider a person as a polysyllabic phenomenon, since by participating in market transactions, a person realizes the values, norms of behavior and principles of attitude towards his partners that he acquired in society. It is in this context that the subjective component of the processes of self-movement of systemic integrity in the economy, society and technology performs the function of synchronization of the processes of their self- movement. Actually the same idea was brilliantly formulated by E. Durkheim (1895) in the sense that Homo Sapiens is always and to the same extent also Homo Socius. As a result, the authors made the assumption that the societal and economic crises accelerated by the coronavirus pandemic have causes being matured for the long period and led to a violation of the coordination (synchronization) of changes in the economic and social systems due to inadequate socialization of subjects. Thus, it is about an essential fundamental problem of our time - inadequate socialization of subjects within the Uncertainty of the Post-Covid Future: How will Humanity Solve this Puzzle? © 2021 Global Journals 53 Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XXI Issue V Version I Year 2021 ( ) B