Global Journal of Medical Research, F: Diseases, Volume 22 Issue 6

The farmer population found in SC constituted a risk group. a) Statistical verification methods The statistical analysis used Epi Info and Excel 2021 from the Microsoft Office suite. In the study, the effectIn assessing the relationship between the causal factor and the consequence, the risk ratio of biostatistics, a 95% confidence interval to extrapolate the detected risk ratio, was calculated as Xi 2 and R on the Pearson criterion in order to determine the statistical significance of the data obtained. As a result of the single-factor analysis, all influencing factors found to be statistically significant were studied in Mantel-Henszel’s multivariate analysis and based on extrapolation. All detected risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were compared at the logarithmic growth rate in the Forest Plot diagrams. III. R esults and D iscussion Undoubtedly, the study of the regional features of the clinical course of urolithiasis in the farming population in the context of the new Uzbekistan is important. The reason is that such research has not been done at the population level. This topical scientific problem has also been the ‘target object’ of our study, and we have concluded that the main and specific urological symptoms of urolithiasis have a number of specific features in the farming population. Table 1 and Figure 1 show the prevalence of the main symptoms of urolithiasis in the farming male and female populations. It turns out that the prevalence of the main symptoms of urolithiasis, with a difference in urolithiasis in male farmers and women, is recorded as follows (Table-1): sudden renal puncture -13.1% and 4.1% (R 1 > 0.005; R 2 <0.01), low back pain - from 70.4% and 57.6% (R 1 > 0.005; R 2 <0.05), severe pain - from 9.2% and 7.0% (R 1 > 0.005; R 2 > 0.05), dyspeptic symptoms - from 19.9% and 10.1% (R 1 > 0.005; R 2 <0.05), hematuria - from 11.2% and 8.3% (R 1 > 0.005; R 2 > 0.05), dysuria - from 82.3% and 74.9% (R 1 > 0.005; R 2 <0.05), oligoanuria - from 27.4% and 15.8% (R 1 > 0.005; R 2 <0.05), dizziness - from 61.2% and 70.5% (R 1 <0.05; R 2 <0.05), obmorok - from 40.8% and 36.7% (R 1 > 0.005; R 2 > 0.05), bradycardia - from 4.9% and 5.2% (R 1 <0.05; R 2 > 0.05) and increased pain on palpation of the lumbar region - from 54.1% and 41.9% (R 1 > 0.005; R 2 <0.05). The main clinical signs of urolithiasis The farmer is a man R Farmers are women The general population of farmers n urolithiasis n urolithiasis n urolithiasis Absolute number Percentage Absolute number Absolute number Absolute number Percentage Acute renal colic 54 412 13.1 > 0.005 16 387 4.1 70 799 8.8 Location of pain in the lumbar region 290 412 70.4 > 0.005 223 387 57.6 513 799 64.2 Extreme pain 38 412 9.2 > 0.005 27 387 7.0 65 799 8.1 Dyspeptic symptoms 82 412 19.9 > 0.005 39 387 10.1 121 799 15.1 Hematuria 46 412 11.2 > 0.005 32 387 8.3 78 799 9.8 Dysuria 339 412 82.3 > 0.005 290 387 74.9 629 799 78.7 Oligoanuria 113 412 27.4 > 0.005 61 387 15.8 174 799 21.8 Dizziness 252 412 61.2 > 0.05 273 387 70.5 525 799 65.7 Features of the Clinical Course of Urinary Stone Disease in the Farming Population 12 Year 2022 Global Journal of Medical Research Volume XXII Issue VI Version I ( D ) F © 2022 Global Journals Table-1: Epidemiological characterization of the prevalence of the main symptoms of urolithiasis in the farmer population