Global Journal of Medical Research, K: Interdisciplinary, Volume 22 Issue 1
Hidden Management of the Strike at UNAM 1999-2000 Alejandro Cuevas-Sosa Abstract- In addition to biomatter, the human body includes a bioenergeme (personal component of organized bioenergemal energy; BEG) and also a possible third virtual (temporary, potential) component as well or biointerfaceme . From my experience regarding bioenergemal communication (BELC, relative to the BEG) practice with BEGs that are either at the BEL universe (where the BEGs arrive after the body biocollapses, dies)or at the biomaterial (BML) universe (space- time), it is possible to biocommunicate with human BEGs regarding topics of mutual interest, like the strike in the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM, acronym in Spanish) 1999-2000. Of course, any BEG can establish BELC from the BEL universe to any BEG at the BML universe and vice versa or between themselves there or here. In the biodialogue that we establish through any relaxation validated technique, the bioimage of a BEG would be a living and acting virtual biointerfaceme, just like the rest of bioimages that are formed during it or in dreams. I. I ntroduction n BELCs from November 15 to 19, 2015, we invited BEGs of the former president of Mexico Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de León and some former rectors of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). The BEG of Zedillo accepted that he promoted the strike in the UNAM from 1999-2000 in order to discredit the Institution. Thus, supporting people, national and foreign, who sought to appropriate it and dogmatize it. And that “I am ashamed and I apologize to all the university students who had to leave the Institution when my stupid neuromindego (brain, thoughts and ego; NMEGO) stopped UNAM”. He acknowledged as his own those responses from a BELC that we had with him on October 11, 2008. 1.2 In the 2015 BELCs Zedillo’s BEG accepted that he and former rector Francisco Barnes de Castro were in collusion to strike UNAM, which remained closed from April 20, 1999 to, say, April 24, 2000, a year and days of conflict. Barnes, at the beginning of the strike, surrounded by journalists, declared that he was prepared for a strike that was going “for a long time”. 3 He acknowledged that the comment was irrelevant “because there I demonstrated or my BEG made it evident the plan against UNAM”. 1 I Author: Managing director, Centro de Prevención y Tratamiento de la Violencia Sexual e Intrafamiliar. e-mail: commentsoneuno@gmail.com never before thought of treating this problem in detail in the BEL investigation, until 2015 when I intuited it after the former rector of UNAM Guillermo Soberon Acevedo published his memoirs. All the BEGs mentioned agreed that their comments could be published. 1 a) Protest Convinced of the crude political handling of the strike at UNAM, from my part, on August 21 and September 25, 1999, I published two articles in the English medical journal Lancet 4,5 and on October 7, 1999, by invitation, I published an article in the English scientific journal Nature . 6 In the three articles, I denounce the political manipulation of the strike at UNAM, I call on the international scientific community to protest the strike and I invited it to the rescue of UNAM; furthermore, in the article published in Nature , I blame the university authorities for being in collusion with the Zedillo government to declare and sustain this deleterious strike. A couple of weeks after the article published in Nature and six months after the strike started: 1) Former rectors Guillermo Soberon Acevedo and Octavio Rivero Serrano went to a national television newscast to comment on the strike. 2) Also, two weeks after the above, on November 12, 1999, thirty-five days after the Nature article, to everyone’s obvious relief, Barnes resigned from the rectory. And, 3) the following week, on November 19, 1999, almost six weeks after the article in Nature , Juan Ramón de la Fuente Ramírez, then Secretary of Health (1994-1999) of the Zedillo government, was appointed rector. Juan Ramón knew how to calm the mood that were very exacerbated. I only note three antecedents, 1) that on August 5, 1999, two weeks before the first article in Lancet , Barnes threatened that if the work stoppage continued, UNAM could “close its doors indefinitely”. 3 2) On November 10, 1999, two days before Barnes’ resignation, 64 members of the University Council supported him and only 10 were against it. 3 In other words, there was a majority of members of the Council who were involved, by omission or by commission, in the problem. And, 3) that between August 25 and 28, 1999, just a week after the first article in Lancet , Zedillo changed his distant and elusive speech of the university conflict for one in which he issued an ultimatum to the strikers to end the strike before “using State methods”. 3 Everything is that the three articles began to circulate, we were able to send multiple letters abroad I 23 Year 2022 Global Journal of Medical Research Volume XXII Issue I Version I ( D ) K © 2022 Global Journals Keywords: biomaterial-bioenergemal universes, bioenergemal communication, bioenergeme, neuromindego, national autonomous university of mexico, mexico city, strike.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NTg4NDg=