Global Journal of Medical Research, K: Interdisciplinary, Volume 22 Issue 1

with copies of them. We addressed various international organizations and personalities. We received multiple samples of support. The BEG of Zedillo recalled that it gave instructions to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs stating that “it was urgent to give an answer” and that the problem was going to be solved. He himself, referring to an international meeting, added that: “Someone commented that the highest academic institution is in trouble and, when this happens, the country goes bankrupt: ‘put beams and good foundations for your institution, otherwise your country will come down’, they told me”. The BEG of Rosario Green Macias, Secretary of Foreign Affairs at the time, specified: “We only had to give a brief answer and of a solution, because they wanted to know what to answer you”. 1 In Zedillo’s opinion, the above was to “fix what had already gotten out of hand” and that the articles gave rise to “an international alarm and led to this stopping, otherwise it would have continued”. He ordered that they “find out” about me, but that at UNAM “there was sufficient information”. He admitted that the three articles also influenced to change his closure against the UNAM. Soberon acknowledged that in his memoirs he comments on this matter of the strike “collaterally but not specifically”. Rivero reproaches himself: “My folly in supporting meaningless projects”. 1 Regarding the strike, Zedillo ordered that they be made known: “Only the publications of authorized newspapers”. Juan Ramón knew about the three articles, but Soberon insisted: “They should not be considered or disseminated”. Soberon accepted that this was the case and that he did it because of: “The forceful way in which events are discussed”. He added that he would have liked to take that initiative, thus the articles had not been published, that the “merit” would have been his: “And that would have been a moment to remember”. 1,4-6 Hence, these data are not mentioned in his memoirs either. Regarding the publication of these articles, the BEG of Juan Ramón assured: “Fortunately, doctor, you indeed listen to your BEG and made known the events as they were presented, and hence the problem has been resolved, because it was spoken with the appropriate people so that it was solved and terminated”. Both the Zedillo and Soberon BEG affirmed that both were subjected to sexual abuse in childhood. 1,2 His parents blamed Soberon as a child for having caused the sexual abuse he suffered and, for this reason, they beat him; no support from them for their child. Based on this antecedent, Soberon justifies how corrupting and unsupportive he is. 1 And the BEG of Zedillo accepted that he likes to grope men, children and ephebos. 1,2 b) Destructivity of Guillermo Soberon Acevedo Being Secretary of Health (1982-1988), Soberon tried to alter or disappear the General Hospital of Mexico, for patients with few resources, located in Mexico City (CDMX, acronym in Spanish). At that time, I published a newspaper article: La function médicosocial del Hospital General . [ The medical-social function of the General Hospital .] El Día, p. 21, October 30, 1985. According to Soberón, after this article he stopped that project and admitted that he did not address this issue in his memoirs either and recognized that they only contain half-truths. For UL, a BEG close to Soberon, “it is inevitable that when a NMEGO [the one from Soberon] agrees to act in this way, it is prevented from living peacefully. Let’s say that he himself has his own sanction, he is a man who lives permanently burdened”. Moreover, the BEG of Jaime Martuscelli Quintana, advisor to the UNAM rectory, believes that Soberon fears that he will speak “because he knows that he has corrupted many people and the truth is always known”. 1 Juan Ramón’s BEG stated: “It’s good that there are voices that speak out when others we are silent, but that we also support. Congratulations!” 1 c) Upgrade BEL communications on February 5 and June 12&14, 2020. In the rectory of the UNAM is Enrique Graue Wiechers, who, competing with Barnes, is emerging as the most negligent predator to ever occupy that position. He held back a bit in his first quadrennium, but in the second term he sank into despair. Well known public facts suggest that he has finished organizing a gang of hooded men whose BEG assured they are paid with cash or drugs. Drug addicts are those who carry out the most violent and destructive operations against university students, men and women, and against the facilities, leaving most of them useless. But now, Graue is desperate because these cloaked men have already gotten out of control, annoying the community without any restraint and occupying schools and colleges at the time they want and even disregarding the order to hand them over, pressuring them to give more money and/or drugs. All with absolute impunity, they are untouchable, neither the UNAM nor the local government promote any action to stop them. The manipulated autonomy of the university is the perfect parapet. d) Behavior of Enrique Graue Wiechers Graue’s BEG accepted that the Ophthalmology Institute that he built in front of The American British Cowdray Hospital in CDMX, was partly built it by diverting resources from the UNAM; in this regard he stated: “I shouldn’t have done it, doctor”. He also admitted owning a “construction company,” which is “in the name of a relative”. It would not be difficult for this to be the one in charge, at UNAM, of the restorations. The formula is very simple: build => destroy => rebuild => huge profits by inflating prices. Graue has had a meteoric career at UNAM, so I affirmed that it appeared that everything was fixed, and Jaime Martuscelli Quintana’s BEG pointed out: “That everything was bought”. Graue, in the BELC of December 19, 2021, 24 Year 2022 Global Journal of Medical Research Volume XXII Issue I Version I ( D ) K © 2022 Global Journals Hidden Management of the Strike at UNAM 1999-2000