Global Journal of Researches in Engineering, A: Mechanical & Mechanics, Volume 22 Issue 1

conventional cantilever wing aircraft due to lower induced drag. However, it suffers from poor field performance and greater complications in structural design. Additionally, this study revealed that while the Box-Wing Aircraft offers improved aerodynamic advantage over conventional cantilever aircraft concept, it is quite challenging to obtain optimal multidisciplinary performance improvement on the Box Wing Aircraft. Notwithstanding, the less radical departure of the concept from conventional configuration enables the use of existing analysis tools for the design of the Box Wing. This makes the Box-Wing Aircraft concept an attractive prospect for aircraft designers in the quest to reduce the environmental impact of aviation. R eferences R éférences R eferencias 1. Wolkovitch J. (1986). The Joined Wing: An Overview, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 23, March 1986, pp 161-178. 2. Munk, M. (1923). The Minimum Induced Drag of Airfoils, Report 121, NACA, March 1923. 3. Prandtl, L. (1924). Induced drag of Multiplanes, Technische Berichte, Vol. III, No. 7, 1924. 4. Addoms, R. B. and Spaid, F.W (2014). Aerodynamic Design of High Performance Biplane Wings, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 629-630. 5. Frediani, A. (2005). The Prandtlwing, Lecture series on innovative configurations and advanced concepts for future civil aircraft ISBN 2-930389-62-1, Von Karman Institute, VKI 2005-06. 6. Bernardini G and Frediani A. (1999). Aerodynamics for MDO of an Innovative Configuration, Applied Vehicle Technology Symposium on Aerodynamic Design and Optimization of Flight Vehicles in a Concurrent Multi- Disciplinary Environment, Research and Technology Organization, NATO. 7. Bagwill T and Selberg B. (1986). Aerodynamic Investigation of Joined Wing Configurations for Transport Aircraft, AIAA 96-2373, 14th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana. 8. Mamla P and Galinski C. (2009). Basic Induced Drag Study of the Joined- Wing Aircraft, Journal of Aircraft, Vol 46, No 4, pp 1438-1440. 9. Smith H and Jemitola P. (2009). A - 9 Box Wing Medium Range Airliner - Project Specification , Department of Aerospace Engineering, Cranfield University, Cranfield. 10. Schiktanz D and Scholz D. (2011). The Conflict of Aerodynamic Efficiency and Static Longitudinal Stability of Box Wing Aircraft, The International Conference of the European Aerospace Societies, 3rd CEAS Air and Space Conference - XXI AIDAA Congress, Venice, Italy. 11. Demasi L. (2007). Investigated on Conditions of Minimum Induced Drag of Closed Wing Systems and C- Wings, Journal of Aircraft, Vol 44, No 1, pp 81-99. 12. Kroo, I. (2005). Nonplanar Wing Concepts for Increased Aircraft Efficiency, Innovative Configuration and Advanced Concepts for Future Civil Aircraft, Von Karman Institute, VKI 2005-06. 13. Burkhalter, J.E, Spring, D.J and Key, M.K. (1992). Downwash for Joined-Wing Airframe with Control Surface Deflections, Journal of Aircraft, Vol 29, No 3, pp 458-464. 14. Corneille, J. (1999). Wind Tunnel Investigation of Joined Wing Configurations, Air Force Institute of Technology , Ohio, USA. 15. Jansen, P.W, Perez, R.E., and Martins, RA. (2010). Aerostructural Optimization of Nonplanar Lifting Surfaces, Journal of Aircraft, Vol 47, No 5, pp 1490- 1503. 16. Nangia, R.K and Palmer, M.E.(2006). Joined Wing Configuration for High Speeds - A First Stage Aerodynamic Study, 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibition, AIAA 2006-0859, pp 9-12, Reston, VA. 17. Yechout, T.R, Oligney, B., and Frash, M. (2008). Aerodynamic Evaluation and Optimization of the Houck Joined Wing Aircraft, AIAA 2008-1422, 46th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada USA. 18. Khalid, A., and Golson, B. (2014). Aerodynamic Analysis of Box Wing Configuration for Unmanned Aircraft System, 2014 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, American Society for Engineering Education. 19. Khalid, A. and Kumar, P. (2014). Aerodynamic Optimization of Box Wing A Case Study, International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Scholarly Summons, Vol 1 Issue 4, Article 6. 20. Jger, C., Kutrovich, D., and Nagy, L (2015). Investigating the Accuracy of Different Fidelity Numerical Methods for Modelling the Aerodynamics of a Box-Wing Aircraft, Conference on Modelling Fluid Flow CMFF15, The 16th International Conference on Fluid Flow Technologies, Budapest, Hungary. 21. Barcala, M., Cuerno-Rejado, C., del Giudice, S., Ganda-Agera, F. and Rodrguez-Sevillano, A.A. (2014). Experimental Investigation on Box-Wing Configuration for UAS, 26th Bristol International Unmanned Air Vehicle Systems Conference, Bristol United Kingdom. 22. Gagnon, H. and Zingg, D.W. (2015). Aerodynamic Optimization Trade Study of a Box-Wing Aircraft Configuration, 56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA SciTech, (AIAA 2015-0695), Florida USA. An Analysis of Aerodynamic Design Issues of Box Wing Aircraft © 2022 Global Journals Global Journal of Researches in Engineering (A ) Volume XxXII Issue I Version I 34 Year 2022