Global Journal of Researches in Engineering, G: Industrial Engineering, Volume 23 Issue 2

Table 3: Comparison of the resultant force angle V. C onclusion A cknowledgement The authors thank the Laboratory Dynamics and Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering members at the Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, for their assistance, opportunities, and provision of facilities. © 2023 Global Journals Global Journal of Researches in Engineering Volume XxXIII Issue II Version I 19 Year 2023 ( ) G Investigating the Effects of Load and Deceleration on Non-Pneumatic Tire Deformation and Stress during Braking -pneumatic tire (NPT) the higher forces acting on the tire, n the on the study's results, it can be Based concluded that the non experiences increased stress and deformation as the load and deceleration values increase. Loading B was found to have a more significant effect on the NPT than loading A due to which resulted in higher levels of Von Mises stress in the spokes. The difference in stress values between the two loadings highlights the need for further research to explore the effects of different types of loads o NPT. The study provides valuable insights into NPT performance under dynamic loads, which is critical for developing NPTs for commercial use. R eferences R R eferencias 1. New York Times , 10. 2. łachowski, J. Proceedings of the 13th International 1st -301). Springer International Publishing. 3. Ali -pneumatic tires for Journal , 69 (1), 38. 4. A comprehensive review on non-pneumatic Materials & Design , 111742. 5. -Heinemann. 6. 7. Fed 8. case study in Iraq. In (Vol. 10, No. 9. 2021 29th ranean Conference on Control and (pp. 566-571). IEEE. 10. -vehicle Analytic methods in accident , 27 , 100124. 11. K., Steinbach, R., ... & Cochrane Injuries Group. (1996). Area ‐ - Cochrane Database of Systematic , 2010 (1). 12. 2010 IEEE 7th International Conference on E- (pp. 385-388). IEEE. 13. investigates the impact of different 14. ). Race car vehicle dynamics (Vol. 400, p. 16). éférences Mayersohn, N. (2005). Reinventing the wheel (and the tire, too). Kucewicz, M., Baranowski, P., & Ma (2017). Airless tire conceptions modeling and simulations. In Scientific Conference: Computer Aided Engineering (pp. 293 , M., Maarij, M., & Hussain, A. (2022). Design and structural analysis of non different structures of polyurethane spokes. of Engineering and Applied Science Deng, Y., Wang, Z., Shen, H., Gong, J., & Xiao, Z. (2023). tire research. Pacejka, H. (2012). Tire and vehicle dynamics. Butterworth Jazar, R. N. (2013). Vehicle dynamics: theory and application. Springer Science & Business Media. eral Highway Administration. (2009). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. U.S. Department of Transportation. Muslim, H., & Itoh, M. (2019, June). Driver behavior in overtaking accidents as a function of driver age, road capacity, and vehicle speed: a Driving Assessment Conference 2019). The University of Iowa. Benterki, A., Boukhnifer, M., Judalet, V., & Maaoui, C. (2021, June). Driving intention prediction and state recognition on the highway. In Mediter Automation (MED) Fountas, G., Fonzone, A., Gharavi, N., & Rye, T. (2020). The joint effect of weather and lighting conditions on injury severities of single accidents. research Bunn, F., Collier, T., Frost, C., Ker, Roberts, I., wide traffic calming for preventing traffic related injuries. Reviews Feng, G., Wang, W., Feng, J., Tan, H., & Li, F. (2010, November). Modeling and simulation for safe following distance based on vehicle braking process. In Tang (2017) Business Engineering vehicle operating parameters on braking distance, such as speed, brake force, road surface conditions, and vehicle load has a significant impact on braking distance. Milliken, W. F., Milliken, D. L., & Metz, L. D. (1995 Warrendale: SAE international. Load Variations The total weight (kg) Deceleration (G) Longitudinal Load Transfer (Kg) FX (N) FY (N) A1 1919 0,8 333,7 3765,3 6343,6 A2 1969 0,8 343,9 3863,4 6516,1 A3 2019 0,8 353,9 3961,5 6687,5 A4 2069 0,8 363,6 4059,6 6857,9 A5 2119 0,8 373,1 4157,7 7027,4 B1 2119 0,4 186,6 2078,8 6112,3 B2 2119 0,5 233,2 2598,6 6341,0 B3 2119 0,6 279,9 3118,3 6569,8 B4 2119 0,7 326,5 3637,9 6798,6 B5 2119 0,8 373,1 4157,7 7027,4