Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, A: Physics and Space Science, Volume 23 Issue 1

The following approach can create a valuable beginning: o Explain the value (significance) of the study. o Defend the model—why did you employ this particular system or method? What is its compensation? Remark upon its appropriateness from an abstract point of view as well as pointing out sensible reasons for using it. o Present a justification. State your particular theory(-ies) or aim(s), and describe the logic that led you to choose them. o Briefly explain the study's tentative purpose and how it meets the declared objectives. Approach: Use past tense except for when referring to recognized facts. After all, the manuscript will be submitted after the entire job is done. Sort out your thoughts; manufacture one key point for every section. If you make the four points listed above, you will need at least four paragraphs. Present surrounding information only when it is necessary to support a situation. The reviewer does not desire to read everything you know about a topic. Shape the theory specifically—do not take a broad view. As always, give awareness to spelling, simplicity, and correctness of sentences and phrases. Procedures (methods and materials): This part is supposed to be the easiest to carve if you have good skills. A soundly written procedures segment allows a capable scientist to replicate your results. Present precise information about your supplies. The suppliers and clarity of reagents can be helpful bits of information. Present methods in sequential order, but linked methodologies can be grouped as a segment. Be concise when relating the protocols. Attempt to give the least amount of information that would permit another capable scientist to replicate your outcome, but be cautious that vital information is integrated. The use of subheadings is suggested and ought to be synchronized with the results section. When a technique is used that has been well-described in another section, mention the specific item describing the way, but draw the basic principle while stating the situation. The purpose is to show all particular resources and broad procedures so that another person may use some or all of the methods in one more study or referee the scientific value of your work. It is not to be a step-by-step report of the whole thing you did, nor is a methods section a set of orders. Materials: Materials may be reported in part of a section or else they may be recognized along with your measures. Methods: o Report the method and not the particulars of each process that engaged the same methodology. o Describe the method entirely. o To be succinct, present methods under headings dedicated to specific dealings or groups of measures. o Simplify—detail how procedures were completed, not how they were performed on a particular day. o If well-known procedures were used, account for the procedure by name, possibly with a reference, and that's all. Approach: It is embarrassing to use vigorous voice when documenting methods without using first person, which would focus the reviewer's interest on the researcher rather than the job. As a result, when writing up the methods, most authors use third person passive voice. Use standard style in this and every other part of the paper—avoid familiar lists, and use full sentences. What to keep away from: o Resources and methods are not a set of information. o Skip all descriptive information and surroundings—save it for the argument. o Leave out information that is immaterial to a third party. XVIII © Copyright by Global Journals | Guidelines Handbook