Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, A: Physics and Space Science, Volume 23 Issue 1

Drawing from the Uyeda book Such drawings do not reflect reality - rising streams will not cool down without cooling. The ocean does not boil, does not receive heat, and the temperature difference on the surface of the planet and under the crust exceeds 3000 degrees Celsius. There is no active heat transfer. A thermos, in fact a very good one, has been working for many centuries. These streams explain the generation of the planet's magnetic field, these streams explain tectonic movements and much more. Taking the hypothesis of convection as a working one and building theories on this basis, scientists are far from reality, replacing them with fantasies. Reality, at least on the example of a kettle, says that the kettle, in the end, boils and there is no convection in it, there is a fierce mixing with one temperature throughout the volume. For reference, the boiling temperature of iron and silicon is only 2800 degrees Celsius. Additionally, it is worth noting that convection requires a constant inflow of energy. It follows that there must be a perpetual, inexhaustible source of heat inside! The reality observed on the planet does not provide examples of this. Based on what has been said, it must be considered that everything underlying this hypothesis is definitely false (see Newton's law). • It is doubtful to consider nuclear reaction (radiogenic hypothesis) as a source of maintaining high temperature inside the planet for the following reasons: the lava flowing from volcanoes is less radioactive compared to, for example, the radiation from an atomic power plant reactor. Also, the concentration of radioactive elements is very low in the overall mass of the planet. Most of them have a short half-life. • The inflow of water into the ocean does not correspond, or even contradicts, the inflow (bulge) of the Earth's crust. II. D istribution of M ass within a P lanet's B ody Based on the previously mentioned Newton's principle, let's see what "phenomenon" can be taken as a prototype of the planet. A very suitable for this is the well-known spherical aquarium. It is filled with water and various materials with different specific weight - sand, stones, plastic toys, fish, feed, etc. As they are distributed, everyone knows. If you tilt it, a shift will occur, and if you rotate it, a constant movement directed towards the Earth by the heavy mass will occur. The aquarium is in a constant gravitational field of the Earth, similarly the Earth is in the attraction field of the Sun. And the Earth is such an aquarium relative to it. And the distribution will be similar - closer to the Sun, heavy masses, the lightest on the opposite side. Now if we imagine that the walls of the aquarium are made of soft, rubber-like material, we can simulate the behaviour of the Earth's crust under the action of the attraction forces of the Sun. If we add water to an inflated air balloon, we will get a visual representation of the behaviour of the Earth's crust - "hump" and its movement upon rotating the balloon. It should be noted that the planet is in a nearly equipotential field of the Sun, meaning that any part of it is attracted to it equally. The distance to the Sun is immeasurably larger than any distance on the planet. The only significant difference between these two vessels is that the weak gravitational forces of the mass located inside the aquarium do not affect its distribution, or rather do not show themselves, while large masses of the planet can redistribute it. 1 Year 2023 43 © 2023 Global Journals Global Journal of Science Frontier Research Volume XXIII Issue ersion I VI ( A ) The New View at the Physics of the Planet Earth