Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, D: Agriculture and Veterinary, Volume 23 Issue 1

Top few accessions of table 3 could be recommended for cultivation as they might be close to ideal plant type we are looking for. From table 3, it is clear that top five genotypes viz ., HD3117, HPYT480, HPAW152, HD3271 and HPAN196 could be recommended to farmers for cultivation in this region. Top few varieties are highly likely to replace the current standard check variety gradually. It is also clear from tables 1, 2 and 3 that only four of these varieties are completely resistant to Karnal bunt. Resistant genotypes like HPYT409, HPAN153, HPYT489 and HPYT490should be recommended for cultivation in this area. The extent of Karnal bunt infestation in susceptible varieties is ranging from 1.33% to 30%. In worst case scenario, the less infested varieties with high relative performance could be recommended for cultivation. Karnal bunt has shown its presence in this region and it should be controlled in its initial stages. This analysis is shown step by step for the comprehension of students, but to be precise, table 1 and table 2 could be merged into a single table and again the data could be sorted in increasing order based on CR or NCR. Thus, the whole paper could be summarized in a single table as given in table 4. This is being named as precise varietal recommender system. Table 4: Precise varietal recommender system R eferences R éférences R eferencias 1. Donald, C.M. 1968. The breeding of crop ideotype. Euphytica, 17: 385-403. 2. Kumar, R. 2021. Prescis(e) varietal recommender system: An example with 20 wheat varieties. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, B.R.D.P.G. College, Deoria, Uttar Pradesh. 3. Singh, S.N. 2017. Normalized Cumulative Ranks for Plant Breeding: An Example. Frontiers in Crop Improvement Journal Vol. 5 (Spl.): 304-306. Print ISSN: 2393-8234; Online ISSN: 2454-6011. 4. Singh, S.N., Sahu, R.K. and Tarkeshwar 2018. Selection from quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) accessions through normalized cumulative ranks. Progressive Research – An International Journal, Volume 13 (Special): 537-538. 5. Yadav, M., Singh, S.N., Tarkeshwar, Sahu, R.K., Kumar, K. and Yadav, P.K. 2020.Selecting suitable wheat (T riticumaestivum L.) variety for Gorakhpur and Deoria region through normalized cumulative ranks. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci, Special Issue- 11: 556-560. Bio Yield 1000 seed wt Yield/ha Days-to- 50%F Flag Leaf Area Karnal Bunt Effective Tillers Spikes/m 2 Spikelets /Ear Ear Length Peduncle Length Plant Ht 10Ear Wt Yield/Plo t 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 HD3117 29.47 (1) 40.67 (13) 30.67 (3) 83.33 (4) 46.74 (7) 3 (6) 6.2 (3) 525.67 (6) 20.53 (3) 11.2 (2) 51.72 (5) 110.7 (3) 30 (4) 2.45 (3) 63 1 14 HPYT480 20.13 (12) 41.67 (8) 32.08 (1) 80 (1) 55.26 (17) 11 (17) 4.33 (19) 460.33 (13) 20.87 (2) 10.87 (4) 51.07 (7) 106.87 (6) 26 (11) 2.57 (1) 119 1.89 17 HPAW152 21.33 (11) 42 (7) 26.83 (8) 84.67 (5) 50.49 (12) 5.67 (13) 4.73 (17) 552 (4) 18 (17) 10.43 (8) 53.79 (1) 108.97 (4) 29.33 (5) 2.15 (8) 120 1.9 1 HD3271 28.13 (3) 40.67 (13) 26.63 (10) 84.67 (5) 49.87 (10) 3.33 (7) 5.87 (7) 570.33 (3) 20.07 (9) 9.83 (13) 47 (14) 97.97 (20) 30.67 (2) 2.13 (10) 126 2 5 HPAN196 19.87 (13) 43.67 (5) 26.46 (11) 86 (10) 46.7 (6) 5 (12) 5.33 (10) 517.67 (9) 20.27 (5) 10.03 (11) 47 (14) 107.83 (5) 28.67 (6) 2.12 (11) 128 2.03 11 HPYT443 22.67 (9) 45.33 (2) 26.75 (9) 85.33 (9) 46.27 (5) 9 (15) 6.53 (1) 427.33 (16)18.73 (12) 10.17 (9) 52.7 (3) 101.73 (10) 22 (19) 2.14 (9) 128 2.03 4 HPAN165 23.07 (8) 45.33 (2) 25.17 (14) 86 (10) 51.26 (13) 9.67 (16) 5.73 (8) 385 (20) 19.13 (11) 10.63 (6) 53.67 (2) 111.23 (2) 28.67 (6) 2.01 (14) 132 2.1 20 HD3226 23.73 (5) 41.67 (8) 20.17 (17) 88.67 (17) 64.49 (20) 3.33 (7) 5.2 (13) 591.33 (1) 20.13 (7) 10.99 (3) 49.33 (12) 105.3 (8) 28.67 (6) 1.61 (17) 141 2.24 6 HPYT409 15.87 (20) 40 (15) 27.63 (6) 84.67 (5) 48.57 (8) 0 (1) 4.2 (20) 518.33 (8) 19.87 (10) 10.01 (12) 50.3 (8) 100 (15) 28 (9) 2.21 (6) 143 2.27 2 HPAN153 28.93 (2) 41.67 (8) 21.04 (16) 84.67 (5) 51.93 (15) 0 (1) 6.47 (2) 420.33 (18)18.53 (13) 9.7 (14) 50.03 (10) 99.93 (16) 26 (11) 1.68 (16) 147 2.33 13 HPYT474 19.2 (15) 43.67 (5) 30.13 (4) 86 (10) 35.84 (1) 3.33 (7) 5.2 (13) 513.67 (10)18.53 (13) 8.67 (20) 44.13 (19)101.73 (10)23.33 (16) 2.41 (4) 147 2.33 19 CSW18 24.27 (4) 40 (15) 17.42 (19) 89.33 (19) 59.84 (19) 3.33 (7) 5.2 (13) 446.33 (15) 22.13 (1) 11.8 (1) 48.63 (13) 112.4 (1) 32.67 (1) 1.39 (19) 147 2.33 8 HPYT424 23.73 (5) 41.33 (12) 30.75 (2) 87.33 (15) 49.05 (9) 11.33 (18) 5.93 (6) 497.33 (12)18.33 (16) 9.47 (18) 50.17 (9) 99.9 (17) 25.33 (13) 2.46 (2) 154 2.44 15 HPYT489 18.67 (17) 37.67 (19) 16 (20) 82.67 (3) 51.51 (14) 0 (1) 5.33 (10) 507 (11) 20.53 (3) 9.67 (15) 51.73 (4) 106.8 (7) 22.67 (18) 1.28 (20) 162 2.57 10 HPYT441 18.93 (16) 38.67 (17) 23.04 (15) 86.67 (14) 42.9 (4) 3.33 (7) 5.27 (12) 520 (7) 17.87 (18) 10.17 (9) 49.7 (11) 102.2 (9) 26.67 (10) 1.84 (15) 164 2.6 16 HPYT490 19.73 (14) 34.33 (20) 25.54 (12) 90 (20) 50.06 (11) 0 (1) 4.8 (16) 579.67 (2) 20.27 (5) 10.53 (7) 46.6 (16) 100.3 (14) 24.67 (14) 2.04 (12) 164 2.6 9 HPYT426 23.6 (7) 44.67 (4) 27.33 (7) 87.33 (15) 57.5 (18) 11.33 (18) 6 (5) 422 (17) 17.53 (19) 9.13 (19) 45.83 (17)100.37 (13) 30.67 (2) 2.19 (7) 168 2.67 7 HPYT418 16.8 (19) 41.67 (8) 25.46 (13) 82 (2) 52.05 (16) 1.33 (5) 4.73 (17) 402.67 (19)18.47 (15) 10.87 (4) 51.3 (6) 98.67 (19) 24.67 (14) 2.04 (12) 169 2.68 3 HPAN163 17.47 (18) 38.67 (17) 29.83 (5) 88.67 (17) 39.37 (3) 6.33 (14) 6.07 (4) 531 (5) 17.07 (20) 9.53 (16) 45.63 (18) 99.34 (18) 23.33 (16) 2.39 (5) 176 2.79 12 HPYT446 22.13 (10) 46.33 (1) 19.33 (18) 86 (10) 35.95 (2) 30 (20) 5.6 (9) 448.33 (14) 20.13 (7) 9.48 (17) 43.03 (20)101.23 (12) 14 (20) 1.55 (18) 178 2.83 S.N. Variety↓ Sort order→ CR NCR Multi-Criteria Selection and Screening for Karnal Bunt Resistance of Wheat ( Triticumaestivum L. Em. Thell.) in Eastern Uttar Pradesh 1 Year 2023 23 © 2023 Global Journals Global Journal of Science Frontier Research Volume XXIII Issue ersion I VI ( )D