Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, D: Agriculture and Veterinary, Volume 23 Issue 4

Table 4: Combining Tables 1 and 2 Together Table 5: Same as Table 4 but after Sorting on CR or NCR Values in Increasing Order On sorting the table 4 on CR or NCR in increasing order we get Table 5 which is enough to sum up the findings of this experiment. Thus, this single table (Table 5) is enough for poster as well as paper presentation of such experiments. From tables 3 & 5, it is clear that the preference order of evaluated chickpea genotypes is PUSA 362, P- 3719, CSG 515, E-100YM, ICC 16015, GNG 1518, RADHA, IPC 94-94, ICC 15850, ICC 3535, ICC 1009 and KWR 108. Top five varieties viz., PUSA 362, P-3719, CSG 515, E-100YM and ICC 16015 could be recommended for cultivation by farmers of this region. Top two varieties were compared with ideal plant type and the graphical presentation shows how close are the top two varieties to the ideal plant type as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Graphical Comparison of Top Two Gram Varieties with Ideal Plant Type SN VARIETY D 50% F D 50% P PH(CM) PBPP SBPP D2M NPPP NSPP BYPP SYPP HI% 100 SEED WT Sort Order→ 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 CSG 515 89(2) 114(2) 43.89(6) 5.33(2) 12.8(1) 129.67(9) 17.87(4) 18.47(5) 9.88(5) 3.94(3) 37.07(5) 17.83(10) 54 1.2 2 E-100 YM 89(2) 116(11) 61.87(1) 4.63(8) 5.53(8) 130(10) 22.8(1) 25.4(2) 12.17(2) 3.36(5) 27.64(9) 18.3(8) 67 1.49 3 GNG 1581 90(6) 118(12) 43.57(7) 5.33(2) 10.87(2) 130(10) 15.73(5) 15.9(7) 9.49(7) 3.19(6) 32.18(8) 20.73(5) 77 1.71 4 ICC 1009 98(12) 115.33(8) 44.65(4) 4.4(10) 7(6) 128(1) 13.21(9) 15.05(8) 6.4(11) 2.45(9) 37.91(3) 16.8(12) 93 2.07 5 ICC 15850 90(6) 114(2) 38.77(12) 5.2(4) 7.33(5) 128.33(3) 8.87(11) 7.6(11) 8.46(8) 2.36(11) 23.27(11) 22.46(4) 88 1.96 6 ICC 16015 89(2) 114(2) 43.19(8) 3.67(12) 8(3) 129(7) 15.45(7) 19.67(4) 9.54(6) 3.58(4) 34.37(7) 18.83(7) 69 1.53 7 ICC 3535 92(9) 114.67(6) 42.51(9) 4.73(7) 8(3) 128.67(5) 12.73(10) 14.82(9) 5.62(12) 3.03(7) 41.72(1) 17.6(11) 89 1.98 8 IPC 94-94 92(9) 115.33(8) 39.19(11) 5.07(5) 5.47(9) 128(1) 15.6(6) 16.33(6) 6.98(10) 2.38(10) 37.84(4) 19.6(6) 85 1.89 9 KWR 108 92(9) 115.67(10) 42.28(10) 17.93(1) 5.07(10) 130(10) 6.47(12) 6.33(12) 7.86(9) 2.19(12) 23.47(10) 23.81(2) 107 2.38 10 P-3719 90(6) 114(2) 47.69(3) 4.53(9) 5.67(7) 128.67(5) 20.93(3) 26.87(1) 10.78(4) 4.57(1) 40.36(2) 18.03(9) 52 1.16 11 PUSA 362 89(2) 112(1) 49.89(2) 4.87(6) 5.03(11) 129.33(8) 20.95(2) 20.82(3) 14.15(1) 4.47(2) 34.44(6) 25.6(1) 45 1 12 RADHA 88(1) 115(7) 44.65(4) 4.4(10) 4.73(12) 128.33(3) 15.27(8) 13.93(10) 11.13(3) 2.54(8) 19.81(12) 23.4(3) 81 1.8 CR NCR SN VARIETY D 50% F D 50% P PH(CM) PBPP SBPP D2M NPPP NSPP BYPP SYPP HI% 100 SEED WT Sort Order→ 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 PUSA 362 89(2) 112(1) 49.89(2) 4.87(6) 5.03(11) 129.33(8) 20.95(2) 20.82(3) 14.15(1) 4.47(2) 34.44(6) 25.6(1) 45 1 2 P-3719 90(6) 114(2) 47.69(3) 4.53(9) 5.67(7) 128.67(5) 20.93(3) 26.87(1) 10.78(4) 4.57(1) 40.36(2) 18.03(9) 52 1.16 3 CSG 515 89(2) 114(2) 43.89(6) 5.33(2) 12.8(1) 129.67(9) 17.87(4) 18.47(5) 9.88(5) 3.94(3) 37.07(5) 17.83(10) 54 1.2 4 E-100 YM 89(2) 116(11) 61.87(1) 4.63(8) 5.53(8) 130(10) 22.8(1) 25.4(2) 12.17(2) 3.36(5) 27.64(9) 18.3(8) 67 1.49 5 ICC 16015 89(2) 114(2) 43.19(8) 3.67(12) 8(3) 129(7) 15.45(7) 19.67(4) 9.54(6) 3.58(4) 34.37(7) 18.83(7) 69 1.53 6 GNG 1581 90(6) 118(12) 43.57(7) 5.33(2) 10.87(2) 130(10) 15.73(5) 15.9(7) 9.49(7) 3.19(6) 32.18(8) 20.73(5) 77 1.71 7 RADHA 88(1) 115(7) 44.65(4) 4.4(10) 4.73(12) 128.33(3) 15.27(8) 13.93(10) 11.13(3) 2.54(8) 19.81(12) 23.4(3) 81 1.8 8 IPC 94-94 92(9) 115.33(8) 39.19(11) 5.07(5) 5.47(9) 128(1) 15.6(6) 16.33(6) 6.98(10) 2.38(10) 37.84(4) 19.6(6) 85 1.89 9 ICC 15850 90(6) 114(2) 38.77(12) 5.2(4) 7.33(5) 128.33(3) 8.87(11) 7.6(11) 8.46(8) 2.36(11) 23.27(11) 22.46(4) 88 1.96 10 ICC 3535 92(9) 114.67(6) 42.51(9) 4.73(7) 8(3) 128.67(5) 12.73(10) 14.82(9) 5.62(12) 3.03(7) 41.72(1) 17.6(11) 89 1.98 11 ICC 1009 98(12) 115.33(8) 44.65(4) 4.4(10) 7(6) 128(1) 13.21(9) 15.05(8) 6.4(11) 2.45(9) 37.91(3) 16.8(12) 93 2.07 12 KWR 108 92(9) 115.67(10) 42.28(10) 17.93(1) 5.07(10) 130(10) 6.47(12) 6.33(12) 7.86(9) 2.19(12) 23.47(10) 23.81(2) 107 2.38 CR NCR SN↓ VARIETY↓ D 50% F D 50% P PH(CM) PBPP SBPP D2M NPPP NSPP BYPP SYPP HI% 100 SEED WT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PUSA 362 2 1 2 6 11 8 2 3 1 2 6 1 45 1 2 P-3719 6 2 3 9 7 5 3 1 4 1 2 9 52 1.16 CR NCR Ideal plant type 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 P-3719 1 PUSA 362 Ideal plant type Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( D ) XXIII Issue IV Version I Year 2023 3 © 2023 Global Journals Multi-Criteria Selection in Gram (Cicer arietinum L.) Germplasm