Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, H: Environment & Earth Science, Volume 22 Issue 5

as reported in Skinner and Murck (2011). Thus the plausibility of a "specific consideration of the 'output of the Earth system' in the form of energy (such as a rapture)," 3 R eferences R éférences R eferencias may be inferred with hope for some people, by a conception "similar to the visions of mystics of all the times and traditions” (CAPRA, 1982; CAPRA, 1983), depending on “[...] how God plays dice” (STEWART, 1997). 1. BALIBREA, F. Chaos, Periodicity and Complexity on Dynamical Systems. In: SENGUPTA, A. Chaos, Nonlinearity, Complexity: The Dynamical Paradigm of Nature. Vol. 206. Springer-Verlag. 2006. 2. BAYLIS, J.; WIRTZ, J.; GRAY, C. (Ed.). Strategy in the Contemporary World. Oxford University Press, USA, 2018. 3. BERLINER, L. M. Statistics, Probability and Chaos. Statistical Science, Vol. 7, No. 1, 69-122. 1992. 4. BERTUGLIA, C. S.; VAIO, F. Nonlinearity, Chaos, and Complexity: The Dynamics of Natural and Social Systems. Oxford University Press. 2005. 5. BEYERCHEN, A. Clausewitz and the Non-Linear Nature of Warfare: Systems of Organized Complexity. In: STRACHAN, H.; HERBERG-ROTHE, A. Clausewitz in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press. 2007. 6. BRASIL. Marinha do Brasil. Escola de Guerra Naval (EGN). Jogos de Guerra – EGN-181 / Ostensivo. Rio de Janeiro. 2018. 7. BREIVIK, M; FOSSEN, T. I. Guidance Laws for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. In: INZARTSEV, A. V. Underwater Vehicles. 1ª Ed. In-tech. 2009. 8. BUSH, V. Science The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President by Vannever Bush, Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, July 1945. United States Government Printing Office, Washington: 1945. 9. ÇAMBEL, A. B. Applied Chaos Theory: A Paradigm for Complexity. Academic Press. 1993. 10. CAPRA, F. O Ponto de Mutação. Editora Cultrix. São Paulo. 1982. 11. CAPRA, F. O Tao da Física: Um Paralelo Entre a Física Moderna e o Misticismo Oriental. Editora Cultrix. São Paulo. 1983. 12. CHASSIGNET, E. P.; VERRON, J. Ocean Modeling and Parameterization. Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 1998. 13. CRUZ, N. A. Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. InTech Web.Org. 2011. 14. DO, K. D.; PAN, J. Controls of Ships and Underwater Vehicles – Design for Underactuated and Nonlinear Marine Systems. Springer, London. 2009. 15. FANELLI, F. Development and Testing of Navigation Algorithms for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. 2020. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Industrial) – Departamento de Engenharia Industrial, Universidade de Florença. Florença, Itália, 2020. 16. FERREIRA, L. R. L. E-Navigation: Solução Safety e Sustentável para uma Nova Era? Revista da Escola de Guerra Naval. V. 27, Nr. 2. 2021. 17. FERREIRA, L. R. L. Ensinar Robôs a Navegar é Salvação Estratégica? Uma Indução a partir da Operação Kamikaze. Revista de Direito e Negócios Internacionais da Maritime Law Academy – International Law and Business Review. V. 1, Nr. 2. 2021. 18. FERREIRA, L. R. L. Aviso aos Navegantes: Possibilidade de “Robôs” na BR do Mar. Revista Marítima Brasileira. V. 142, Nr. 04/06. 2022. 19. FOSSEN, T. I. Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles. Wiley. 1994. 20. FOSSEN, T. I. Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2011. 21. FOSSEN, T. I. Marine Control Systems: Guidance, Navigation and Control of Ships, Rigs and Underwater Vehicles. Marine Cybernetics. 2002. 22. GAUB, F. Conflicts to Come - 15 Scenarios for 2030. European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS). 2020. 23. GLEICK, J. Chaos: Making a New Science. Open Road. 1987. 24. GODET, M. The Art of Scenarios and Strategic Planning: Tools and Pitfalls. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 65, 3-22. 2000. 25. GRIBBIN, J. Deep Simplicity: Chaos, Complexity and the Emergence of Life. Penguin Group. 2004. 26. GRIFFITHS, G. Technology and Applications of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. Taylor & Francis. 2003. © 2022 Global Journals 1 Global Journal of Science Frontier Research Volume XXII Issue V Year 2022 28 ( H ) Version I Autonomous Technology in Scenario by Rare Geophysical Processes (Underwater Focus) 3 “ Popular and generalize discussions [...] that point to bleak prospects” (KAHN et al ., 1976) – more appropriately: particular consideration about an apocalyptic event (as per theological inferences from the book "Revelation," Holy Bible). That it’s like "bleak" in terms of being "mysterious, not fully revealed or exposed"; however, its outcome, fosters hope – “salvation” but from a metaphysical (transcendental) perspective, and victory (for some), and posteriorly, a “salvation of the Earth”, referring to “the Earth system” (SKINNER e MURCK, 2011), or a renewal of all – from a mystical perspective. Another perspective, a widespread one, concerns “extraterrestrial beings” who abduct people – however, by a pseudo-scientific bias – in reality, theories must be: high in narrative rationality, self-consciously operated, deliberately separate as to validation, as well as being plausible; the expected result is by “knowledge growth by extension” – “when the relatively complete explanation of a small region is then transferred to the explanation of adjacent regions” (such as the gradual construction of a puzzle as more pieces become available) (WEICK, 1989).